The Evaluation of Temporary Shelter Areas Locations Using Geographic Information System and Analytic Hierarchy Process

Javad Junian, Valiollah Azizifar

Abstract


Earthquakes are notorious as devastating natural disasters that can result in tragic fatalities and economic loss. The building of earthquake evacuation shelters is an effective way to reduce earthquake consequences and protect lives. In present study, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was applied as a multiple criteria of decision making (MCDM) method to investigate different shelter sites that belong to a disaster-prone area of the north of Iran. The principles of vulnerable areas, access to roads, firefighting centers, populated areas, fault lines, and medical centers were considered to determine optimal temporary shelter areas locations. With the support of a geographic information system (GIS), the method comprised three steps, i.e. selecting candidate shelters, analyzing the spatial coverage of the shelters, and determining the shelter locations. Finally, a case study was used to demonstrate the application of the multi-criteria model and the corresponding solution method and their effectiveness in planning urban earthquake evacuation shelters. It was found that the “distance from fault line” criterion of 0.429 could be the most effective factor along the others.


Keywords


Disaster Management; Geographic Information System; Analytic Hierarchy Process; Earthquake; Shelter Site Selection.

References


Chen, Zhifen, Xiang Chen, Qiang Li, and Jin Chen. “The Temporal Hierarchy of Shelters: a Hierarchical Location Model for Earthquake-Shelter Planning.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 27, no. 8 (January 30, 2013): 1612–1630. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.763944.

EM-DAT, 2015. Natural disasters trends. The International Disaster Database, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). http://www.emdat.be/natural-disasters-trends (Accessed on 10 November 2015).

Desouza, Kevin C., and Trevor H. Flanery. “Designing, Planning, and Managing Resilient Cities: A Conceptual Framework.” Cities 35 (December 2013): 89–99. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003.

Bayram, Vedat, Barbaros Ç. Tansel, and Hande Yaman. “Compromising System and User Interests in Shelter Location and Evacuation Planning.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 72 (February 2015): 146–163. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2014.11.010.

Triantaphyllou, Evangelos, Boris Kovalerchuk, Lawrence Mann, and Gerald M. Knapp. “Determining the Most Important Criteria in Maintenance Decision Making.” Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 3, no. 1 (March 1997): 16–28. doi:10.1108/13552519710161517.

De Almeida, A.T., and G.A. Bohoris. “Decision Theory in Maintenance Decision Making.” Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 1, no. 1 (March 1995): 39–45. doi:10.1108/13552519510083138.

Alçada-Almeida, Luís, Lino Tralhão, Luís Santos, and João Coutinho-Rodrigues. “A Multiobjective Approach to Locate Emergency Shelters and Identify Evacuation Routes in Urban Areas.” Geographical Analysis 41, no. 1 (January 2009): 9–29. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2009.00745.x.

El-Anwar, Omar, Khaled El-Rayes, and Amr Elnashai. “An Automated System for Optimizing Post-Disaster Temporary Housing Allocation.” Automation in Construction 18, no. 7 (November 2009): 983–993. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2009.05.003.

Sadidi, Javad, Reyhaneh Saeedi, Aliasghar Torahi, and Parviz Zeaiean Firuzabadi. “Determining the Optimal Algorithm to Locate the Best Place for Earthquake Refugee Camps: A Case Study for Tehran, Iran.” Positioning 05, no. 04 (2014): 97–106. doi:10.4236/pos.2014.54012.

Chu, Jianyu, and Youpo Su. “The Application of TOPSIS Method in Selecting Fixed Seismic Shelter for Evacuation in Cities.” Systems Engineering Procedia 3 (2012): 391–397. doi:10.1016/j.sepro.2011.10.061.

Hosseini, S. M. Amin, Albert de la Fuente, and Oriol Pons. “Multicriteria Decision-Making Method for Sustainable Site Location of Post-Disaster Temporary Housing in Urban Areas.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 142, no. 9 (September 2016): 04016036. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001137.

Trivedi, Ashish, and Amol Singh. “Prioritizing Emergency Shelter Areas Using Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Approach: A Case Study.” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 24, no. 3–4 (April 21, 2017): 133–145. doi:10.1002/mcda.1611.

Chen, Zhifen, Xiang Chen, Qiang Li, and Jin Chen. “The Temporal Hierarchy of Shelters: a Hierarchical Location Model for Earthquake-Shelter Planning.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 27, no. 8 (January 30, 2013): 1612–1630. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.763944.

Choi, Jong-Ho, In-Joon Kang, and Sang-Seok King. “Study on the Selection of the Tsunami Shelter Using AHP and GIS Analysis.” Korean Journal of Geomatics 30, no. 6_1 (December 31, 2012): 503–509. doi:10.7848/ksgpc.2012.30.6-1.503.

Kılcı, Fırat, Bahar Yetiş Kara, and Burçin Bozkaya. “Locating Temporary Shelter Areas after an Earthquake: A Case for Turkey.” European Journal of Operational Research 243, no. 1 (May 2015): 323–332. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.035.

Givechi, S., Attar, M. A., Rashidi, A., & Nasbi, N. (2013). Site selection of temporary housing after earthquake by GIS and AHP method Case study: Region 6 of Shiraz. Urban-Regional Studies and Research Journal, 5(17), 29-32.

Forouzandeh, Ali Javan, Mahmood Hosseini, and Maryam Sadeghzadeh. "Guidelines for Design of Temporary Shelters After Earthquakes Based on Community Participation." In14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, Oct, pp. 12-17. 2008.

BOLIN, ROBERT, and LOIS STANFORD. “Shelter, Housing and Recovery: A Comparison of U.S. Disasters.” Disasters 15, no. 1 (March 1991): 24–34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.1991.tb00424.x.

Hosseini Nasab H, Tavana M, Yousefi M. A new heuristic algorithm for the planar minimum covering circle problem. Production & Manufacturing Research. 2014 Jan 1;2(1):142-55.

Hadiguna, Rika Ampuh, Insannul Kamil, Azalika Delati, and Richard Reed. “Implementing a Web-Based Decision Support System for Disaster Logistics: A Case Study of an Evacuation Location Assessment for Indonesia.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 9 (September 2014): 38–47. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.02.004.

Tsai, Chung-Hung, and Yi-Lung Yeh. “The Study of Integrating Geographic Information with Multi-Objective Decision Making on Allocating the Appropriate Refuge Shelters: Using Kengting National Park as an Example.” Natural Hazards 82, no. 3 (March 19, 2016): 2133–2147. doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2298-9.

Tamima, Umma, and Luc Chouinard. “Development of Evacuation Models for Moderate Seismic Zones: A Case Study of Montreal.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 16 (June 2016): 167–179. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.02.003.

Saaty TL, The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York, (1980).

Saaty, Thomas L. “What Is Relative Measurement? The Ratio Scale Phantom.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 17, no. 4–5 (February 1993): 1–12. doi:10.1016/0895-7177(93)90170-4.

Chakraborty, Shankar, and Debabrata Banik. “Design of a Material Handling Equipment Selection Model Using Analytic Hierarchy Process.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 28, no. 11–12 (June 29, 2005): 1237–1245. doi:10.1007/s00170-004-2467-y.

Zou, X., & Li, D. (2008). A multidisciplinary GIS-based approach for the potential evaluation of land consolidation projects: a model and its application. In WSEAS International Conference. Proceedings. Mathematics and Computers in Science and Engineering (No. 7). World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society.

Hu, Fuyu, Saini Yang, and Wei Xu. “A Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for the Location and Districting Planning of Earthquake Shelters.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28, no. 7 (March 14, 2014): 1482–1501. doi:10.1080/13658816.2014.894638.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/cej-03091104

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 valiollah azizifar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message