Effect of Admixtures on Mechanical Properties of Cementitious Mortar

Cementitious Composites Mortar Styrene Butadiene Rubber Silica Fumes Fly Ash Mechanical Properties SEM.

Authors

  • Ahmed Jawad Shaukat
    civiljawad867@gmail.com
    School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan,, China
  • Hu Feng School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan,, China
  • Anwar Khitab Department of Civil Engineering, Mirpur University of Science and Technology (MUST) Mirpur 10250, AJK,, Pakistan
  • Ahmad Jan School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan,, China

Downloads

In the current study, the primary focus is to investigate the effect of Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR), silica fume and fly ash on compressive and flexure strengths of cementitious mortar. Three types of specimens are prepared; the first series comprises of control specimen; the second one consists of the mortar's specimen modified with SBR and the third one consists of the mortar's specimen modified with SBR in a combination of fly ash and silica fumes. Mortar samples are cast in the weight ratio of 1:2.75 (cement: sand). The SBR is added at a rate of 20% of the mass of cement. The water to cement ratio (W/C) is kept at 0.5 for control specimens and the quantity of mixing water in SBR-containing samples is reduced by the same amount as the SBR is added: The adjustment is meant to obtain same consistency for all the specimens.  20% fly ash and 2.5% silica fume are added to the mortar as replacement of cement. Compressive and flexure tests are carried out according to ASTM standards. Moreover, SEM is also performed on samples at the age of 28 days. Studies reveal that SBR and SCMs reduce the mechanical strength of the mortars. SEM and EDS studies show that SBR hinders the formation of albite, whereas silica content from silica fumes and fly ash converts CaCO3 to Wollastonite (a white loose powder), which is responsible for the reduction of mechanical strength. The study also confirms that the addition of SBR in place of water hinders the formation of primary and secondary hydration products.

 

Doi: 10.28991/cej-2020-03091610

Full Text: PDF