Unconfined Compressive Strength Characteristics of Overboulder Asbuton and Zeolite Stabilized Soft Soil
Soft soil was one of the most widely encountered problems in construction, especially for archipelago countries which most of its area was lowland with a high deposit of soft soil. To overcome this problem, soil stabilization was one of the most widely used as a solution. Soil stabilization in general uses chemical substances that are classified as pozzolan material. Pozzolan material uses its capability to strengthen the cohesion of soil grains. Mostly, pozzolan material consists of silica. Overboulder asbuton and zeolite were examples of natural pozzolan material in Indonesia. Both materials have a high silica content. Thus, the author interested to figure out the mechanical behavior of these two substances as a soil stabilizer. This research was a correlating study to the previous paper with the same author which discusses the overboulder asbuton as a soil stabilizer. Overboulder added to the mix is determined as 15%, with varied zeolite percentages applied to examine the differences. The UCT was conducted according to ASTM D-2166 as a parameter. As the standard remolding method, a standard proctor test was conducted to determine the optimum moisture content and the maximum density of each mix. While the UCT specimens were tested at the certain curing time for each composition. The curing time applied was 0, 7, 14, and 28 days. By this curing period, the effective pozzolanic reaction that occurs for each composition could be determined. The result shows that zeolite addition to overboulder asbuton could increase the soil density and increase its compressive strength. It is indicated that overboulder asbuton and zeolite mix could be a proper alternative as a soil stabilizer.
Full Text: PDF
Dhani, Noor, Lawalenna Samang, Tri Harianto, and A.R Djamaluddin. “Experimental Study on Bearing Capacity of Soft Soil Stabilization Using Overboulder Asbuton as Sub-Base Layer.” Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 15, no. 4 (November 20, 2019): 1043–1051. doi:10.36478/jeasci.2020.1043.1051.
Dhani, Noor, Lawalenna Samang, Tri Harianto, and A. R. Djamaluddin. “Experimental Study on CBR Value of Overboulder Asbuton Stabilized by Cement.” International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering Research (2020): 165–169. doi:10.18178/ijscer.9.2.165-169.
Muhiddin, Achmad Bakri, and Marthen M. Tangkeallo. “Correlation of Unconfined Compressive Strength and California Bearing Ratio in Laterite Soil Stabilization Using Varied Zeolite Content Activated by Waterglass.” Materials Science Forum 998 (June 2020): 323–328. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.998.323.
Terzano, Roberto, and Matteo Spagnuolo. “Heavy Metal Stabilization by Promoting Zeolite Synthesis in Soil.” Detoxification of Heavy Metals (August 2011): 423–438. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21408-0_22.
Siswati, Nana Dyah, Fikri Adji Ardiantono, and Lintang Karunia Putri. “Karakterisasi Komponen Aktif Pozzolan Untuk Pengembangan Portland Pozzolan Cement (PPC).” Jurnal Teknik Kimia 12, no. 2 (July 3, 2018). doi:10.33005/tekkim.v12i2.1085.
Day, Robert L., and Caijun Shi. “Influence of the Fineness of Pozzolan on the Strength of Lime Natural-Pozzolan Cement Pastes.” Cement and Concrete Research 24, no. 8 (1994): 1485–1491. doi:10.1016/0008-8846(94)90162-7.
Nurchasanah, Yenny. “Characteristic of ‘Tulakan’ Soil as Natural Pozzolan to Substitute Portland Cement as Construction Material.” Procedia Engineering 54 (2013): 764–773. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.070.
Kadhum, Akram Obeed, and Haider M. Owaid. “Experimental Investigation of Self-Compacting High Performance Concrete Containing Calcined Kaolin Clay and Nano Lime.” Civil Engineering Journal 6, no. 9 (September 1, 2020): 1798–1808. doi:10.28991/cej-2020-03091583.
ACI “Engineering Properties of Alkali-Activated Natural Pozzolan Concrete.” ACI Materials Journal 108, no. 1 (2011). doi:10.14359/51664217.
ACI “Alkali-Activated Natural Pozzolan Concrete as New Construction Material.” ACI Materials Journal 110, no. 3 (2013). doi:10.14359/51685667.
“Standard Proctor Test.” Dictionary Geotechnical Engineering/Wörterbuch GeoTechnik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. (2014): 1297–1297. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41714-6_196662.
ASTM, “Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil”; (2000). doi:10.1520/d2166-00.
SGC “Soil Classification System, Unified.” Springer Reference; doi:10.1007/springerreference_4303.
Biryukov, N. S., A. G. Polunovskii, and S. V. Timofeev. “State Standard for Laboratory Method of Determining Maximum Soil Density.” Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 16, no. 1 (January 1979): 56–57. doi:10.1007/bf01704591.
Agustina, Dian Hastari. “Pengaruh Energi Pemadatan Terhadap Nilai Kepadatan Tanah.” Sigma Teknika 2, no. 2 (November 30, 2019): 202. doi:10.33373/sigma.v2i2.2067.
SGC “Interpretations of Soil Surveys and Technical Soil Classification.” Soil Genesis and Classification (August 5, 2011): 425–435. doi:10.1002/9780470960622.ch21.
SGC “Modern Soil Classification Systems.” Soil Genesis and Classification (August 5, 2011): 181–205. doi:10.1002/9780470960622.ch6.
Govindasamy, Panbarasi, Mohd Raihan Taha, Jamal Alsharef, and Kowstubaa Ramalingam. “Influence of Nanolime and Curing Period on Unconfined Compressive Strength of Soil.” Applied and Environmental Soil Science 2017 (2017): 1–9. doi:10.1155/2017/8307493.
Copyright (c) 2021 Noor Dhani, Ahmad Gasruddin, Hartini Hartini, La Baride
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.