Measuring Belt and Road Initiative Perceptions: A Comparative Analysis of Thai Border and Non-Border Regions

Thanapong Champahom; Dissakoon Chonsalasin; Kestsirin Theerathitichaipa; Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao; Fareeda Watcharamaisakul; Rattanaporn Kasemsri; Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha

doi:10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-12-010

Authors

Thanapong Champahom Department of Management, Faculty of Business Administration, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima,, Thailand
Dissakoon Chonsalasin Department of Transportation, Faculty of Railway Systems and Transportation, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima,, Thailand
Kestsirin Theerathitichaipa School of Transportation Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima,, Thailand
Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao
sajjakaj@g.sut.ac.th
School of Transportation Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima,, Thailand
Fareeda Watcharamaisakul School of Transportation Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima,, Thailand
Rattanaporn Kasemsri School of Civil Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima,, Thailand
Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha School of Transportation Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima,, Thailand

Vol. 10 No. 12 (2024): December

Research Articles

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

This study aims to analyze and compare perceptions of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) between border and non-border regions in Thailand, addressing a gap in understanding how geographic proximity influences BRI project views. Using a sample of 3,200 respondents, this study employed confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance techniques to examine perceptions across eight key constructs related to BRI impacts. The findings reveal significant structural differences in BRI perceptions between border and non-border regions. Non-border regions generally showed more consistently positive perceptions across all constructs, while border regions demonstrated more varied and nuanced views. Notable differences were observed in perceptions of economic benefits, logistics improvements, and social impacts. This study contributes to the field by providing a comprehensive comparative analysis of BRI perceptions across different geographical contexts within a single country, employing advanced statistical methods to ensure valid comparisons. The results suggest the need for tailored approaches to BRI implementation and communication in different regions, implementing inclusive policy-making processes, and establishing robust monitoring and evaluation systems to address the varied perceptions and potential impacts of BRI projects in Thailand.

Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-12-010

Full Text: PDF

Champahom, T., Chonsalasin, D., Theerathitichaipa, K., Jomnonkwao, S., Watcharamaisakul, F., Kasemsri, R., & Ratanavaraha, V. (2024). Measuring Belt and Road Initiative Perceptions: A Comparative Analysis of Thai Border and Non-Border Regions. Civil Engineering Journal, 10(12), 3966–3985. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-12-010

Download Citation

[1] Li, B., Hu, J., Chen, G., Xiao, D., & Cheng, S. (2022). The environmental effects of regional economic cooperation: Evidence from the Belt and Road Initiative. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.1020502.
[2] Gong, X. (2019). The Belt & Road Initiative and China's influence in Southeast Asia. Pacific Review, 32(4), 635–665. doi:10.1080/09512748.2018.1513950.
[3] Punyaratabandhu, P., & Swaspitchayaskun, J. (2018). The Political Economy of China–Thailand Development under the One Belt One Road Initiative: Challenges and Opportunities. Chinese Economy, 51(4), 333–341. doi:10.1080/10971475.2018.1457326.
[4] Wang, C., Lim, M. K., Zhang, X., Zhao, L., & Lee, P. T. W. (2020). Railway and road infrastructure in the Belt and Road Initiative countries: Estimating the impact of transport infrastructure on economic growth. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 134, 288–307. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2020.02.009.
[5] Snitwongse, K. (2001). Thai foreign policy in the global age: Principle or profit? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 23(2), 189–212. doi:10.1355/CS23-2A.
[6] Apaitan, T., Luangaram, P., & Manopimoke, P. (2022). Uncertainty in an emerging market economy: evidence from Thailand. Empirical Economics, 62(3), 933–989. doi:10.1007/s00181-021-02054-y.
[7] Tritto, A., & Camba, A. (2023). The Belt and Road Initiative in Southeast Asia: A Mixed Methods Examination. Journal of Contemporary China, 32(141), 436–454. doi:10.1080/10670564.2022.2090099.
[8] Ploywarin, S., Song, Y., & Sun, D. (2018). Research on factors affecting public risk perception of Thai high-speed railway projects based on "Belt and Road Initiative.” Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6), 10 3390 10061978. doi:10.3390/su10061978.
[9] Di Graziano, A., & Marchetta, V. (2021). A risk-based decision support system in local railways management. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 20. doi:10.1016/j.jrtpm.2021.100284.
[10] Punyaratabandhu, P., & Swaspitchayaskun, J. (2021). Thailand's Perception and Strategy toward China's BRI Expansion: Hedging with Cooperating. The Chinese Economy, 54(1), 69–77. doi:10.1080/10971475.2020.1809819.
[11] Ma, S. (2022). Growth effects of economic integration: New evidence from the Belt and Road Initiative. Economic Analysis and Policy, 73, 753–767. doi:10.1016/j.eap.2022.01.004.
[12] Cao, Y., Jiang, A., Cao, Z., Fayyaz, A., Li, J., Chen, W., & Guo, W. (2022). Impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on Economic-Social-Natural Ecological Niches and Their Coupling Coordination: Evidence from 11 Countries along the Route. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.913928.
[13] Jomnonkwao, S., Champahom, T., & Ratanavaraha, V. (2020). Methodologies for determining the service quality of the intercity rail service based on users' perceptions and expectations in Thailand. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(10), 4259. doi:10.3390/su12104259.
[14] Theerathitichaipa, K., Wisutwattanasak, P., Se, C., Seefong, M., Jomnonkwao, S., Champahom, T., Ratanavaraha, V., & Kasemsri, R. (2024). Assessment of Disparity in Accessing Railway Stations in Thailand: an Application Geographic Information System Network Analysis. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 8(1), 6. doi:10.1007/s41651-023-00168-8.
[15] Wedel, P. F., & Rondinelli, D. A. (2001). Thailand: Opportunities and risks in a fast"changing business environment. Thunderbird International Business Review, 43(6), 797–812. doi:10.1002/tie.1030.
[16] Khamphengvong, V., Zhang, H., Wu, Q., & Thavisay, T. (2022). Examine the Economic and Social Effects on Lao People's Perceived Benefit Attitudes towards BRI. Sustainability, 14(9), 5088. doi:10.3390/su14095088.
[17] Kuik, C. C., & Rosli, Z. (2023). Laos-China infrastructure cooperation: legitimation and the limits of host-country agency. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 12(1), 32–58. doi:10.1080/24761028.2023.2274236.
[18] Bunnak, P., Song, N., Chen, X., & Thomson, R. (2024). A governance perspective on China's belt and road initiative: a case study of the Sino-Thai railway project. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1–20. doi:10.1080/17516234.2024.2386719.
[19] Man, C. Y., & Palmer, D. A. (2022). Geo-mapping databases of the Belt and Road Initiative. Figshare, London, United Kingdom. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6076193.
[20] Nambulee, W., Champahom, T., Jomnonkwao, S., Watthanaklang, D., & Ratanavaraha, V. (2023). Comprehending travel intentions during and after the Covid-19 pandemic based on psychological theory models. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 22. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2023.100933.
[21] Aiyara, T. (2019). The Long and Winding Railway: Domestic Politics and the Realization of China-Initiated High-Speed Railway Projects in Thailand. Chinese Political Science Review, 4(3), 327–348. doi:10.1007/s41111-019-00124-2.
[22] Heiduk, F., & Sakaki, A. (2019). Introduction to the Special Issue”China's Belt and Road Initiative: The View from East Asia. East Asia, 36(2), 93–113. doi:10.1007/s12140-019-09312-y.
[23] Liu, S., Wan, Y., & Zhang, A. (2020). Does China's high-speed rail development lead to regional disparities? A network perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 138, 299-321. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.010.
[24] Lieophairot, C., & Rojniruttikul, N. (2023). Factors affecting state railway of Thailand (SRT) passenger train service use decision: A structural equation model. Heliyon, 9(5), 15660. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15660.
[25] Hurley1, J., Morris2, S., & Portelance3, G. (2019). Examining the debt implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a policy perspective. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 3(1), 139. doi:10.24294/jipd.v3i1.1123.
[26] Bouraima, M. B., Alimo, P. K., Agyeman, S., Sumo, P. D., Lartey-Young, G., Ehebrecht, D., & Qiu, Y. (2023). Africa's railway renaissance and sustainability: Current knowledge, challenges, and prospects. Journal of Transport Geography, 106, 103487. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103487.
[27] Luo, H., & Zhao, S. (2021). Impacts of high-speed rail on the inequality of intercity accessibility: A case study of Liaoning Province, China. Journal of Transport Geography, 90. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102920.
[28] Moscovici, M. (1961). Child personality and rural environment. í‰tudes Rurales, 1(1), 57–69. doi:10.3406/rural.1961.963.
[29] Moscovici, S. (1988). Social representations: Essays in social psychology. NYU Press, New York, United States.
[30] Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211, Academic Press, Cambridge, United States.
[31] Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. doi:10.1002/hbe2.195.
[32] Hung, J. (2024). Transitioning to Greener Sino-Thai Belt and Road Initiative: How China Finance Thailand's Environmental Sustainability. Environmental Health Insights, 18, 11786302241258348. doi:10.1177/11786302241258348.
[33] Ashraf, J., Luo, L., & Anser, M. K. (2022). Do BRI policy and institutional quality influence economic growth and environmental quality? An empirical analysis from South Asian countries affiliated with the Belt and Road Initiative. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(6), 8438–8451. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-16330-y.
[34] Ahmad, T., & Ullah, S. (2023). Development under Belt and Road Initiative: Gains for Tourism Industry in Participant Countries. Journal of China Tourism Research, 19(4), 950–972. doi:10.1080/19388160.2023.2167895.
[35] Liu, M., & Ma, H. (2023). Untangling the effects of the Belt and Road Initiative on carbon dioxide emissions. Journal of Environmental Management, 325(Pt B), 116628. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116628.
[36] Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Statistical analysis with latent variables using Mplus. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, United States.
[37] Rigg, J., Law, L., Tan-Mullins, M., & Grundy-Warr, C. (2005). The Indian Ocean tsunami: Socio-economic impacts in Thailand. Geographical Journal, 171(4), 374–379. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2005.00175_3.x.
[38] Chachavalpongpun, P. (2024). Roots of Resilience: Interests and Values in Thai Foreign Policy. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 43(3), 18681034241248475. doi:10.1177/18681034241248475.
[39] Lindberg, J., & Biddulph, R. (2021). China's belt and road initiative: The need for livelihood-inclusive stories. Geoforum, 121, 138–141. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.02.015.
[40] Leng, T. (2019). Underlying Factors of Cambodia's Bandwagoning with China's Belt and Road Initiative. East Asia, 36(3), 243–253. doi:10.1007/s12140-019-09316-8.
[41] Zhang, E., & James, P. (2023). All Roads Lead to Beijing: Systemism, Power Transition Theory and the Belt and Road Initiative. Chinese Political Science Review, 8(1), 18–44. doi:10.1007/s41111-022-00211-x.
[42] Farazi, N. P., Murshed, M. N., & Hadiuzzaman, M. (2022). Application of machine learning to investigate heterogeneity in users' perception of intercity train service quality in developing countries. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(1), 227–238. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2021.12.004.
[43] Yang, Y., & Li, F. (2019). ASEAN–China Cooperation under the Framework of the Belt and Road Initiative: A Comparative Study on the Perspectives of China and ASEAN. The Belt and Road Initiative, 1–58, World Scientific, Singapore. doi:10.1142/9789811205774_0001.
[44] Park, S. C. (2022). The roles and strategies of ASEAN in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto, 03, 115–148. doi:10.18543/ced-03-2022pp115-148.

Publication Start Year:	2015
JCR 2024 Impact Factor (IF):	4.9
JIF QUARTILE:	Q1
SJR 2024 Quartile:	Q1
Acceptance Rate:	27%
Review Speed (Average):	81 days
Issue Per Year:	12
Number of Volumes:	11
Number of Issues:	119
Number of Articles:	1816
Number of Reviewers:	3624
Number of Contributors:	6178
Contributing Countries:	91
No. of WoS Citations:	7986
Scopus CiteScore:	6.5
No. of Google Citations:	24065
Google h-index:	56
Google i10-index:	804
Abstract Views:	11,481,612
PDF Download:	5,908,793

Measuring Belt and Road Initiative Perceptions: A Comparative Analysis of Thai Border and Non-Border Regions

Authors

Downloads

Downloads

Login

Publisher and Affiliated Societies

Publisher

Society Collaborations

Indexing & Abstracting

SidebarMenu

Journal Imprint

Journal Imprint

Journal Metrics

Follow us

Follow Us

Most Cited Articles

Heavy Metal Removal Investigation in Conventional Activated Sludge Systems

Modeling of the Solar Thermal Energy Use in Urban Areas

Adsorption Behavior of Heavy Metal Ions by Hybrid Inulin-TEOS for Water Treatment

Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review

visitors

Analytics

Information

Address

Contact Info: