Treatment of Industrial Wastewater of Variable Quality Using Ultrasound Irradiation

Mohd E. Ahmed; Mishari Khajah; Hussain Abdullah; Rashed Al-Yaseen

doi:10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-04-013

Authors

Mohd E. Ahmed
miahmed@kisr.edu.kw
Water Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, P.O. Box: 24885, Safat 13109,, Kuwait http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0403-4406
Mishari Khajah Water Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, P.O. Box: 24885, Safat 13109,, Kuwait
Hussain Abdullah Water Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, P.O. Box: 24885, Safat 13109,, Kuwait
Rashed Al-Yaseen Water Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, P.O. Box: 24885, Safat 13109,, Kuwait

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2025): April

Research Articles

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

This paper investigated the use of ultrasound irradiation to treat real mixed industrial wastewater under various conditions, including single and dual frequencies, variable wastewater strengths, and different operating conditions, including flow rates/residence times. This work is important to evaluate the organics' removal efficiency and to identify operational control bottlenecks under actual wastewater conditions. The highest removal efficiencies were 69.5% and 31.9% for COD and TOC, respectively, for the high-strength wastewater, which were found to occur at 16 kHz frequencies and 500 ml/min flow rate. The removal efficiencies were slightly less in the case of medium-strength wastewater (66.7 and 25.3% for COD and TOC, respectively). They were found to occur at dual frequencies of 16/20 kHz and 1500 and 1000 ml/min, respectively. For the low-strength wastewater, the efficiencies reached 78.6 and 9.1% for COD and TOC, respectively, at the same frequency and flow rates as the medium-strength wastewater. These findings demonstrated the effectiveness of dual frequency in medium- to low-strength wastewater. Among the organics monitored, chloroform (CHCl₃), tetrachloroethene (C₂Cl₄), 1,4 dichlorobenzene (C₆H₄Cl₂), and dichloromethane (CH₂Cl₂) exhibited variable removal, and in some cases, the removal was found to be negative, indicating intermediary products as a result of incomplete oxidation of organics. Besides the frequency and flow rate, it was found that the concentration of metals and organics are mostly positive influencers on organics removal. At the same time, TDS and pH have mixed effects, but they positively influence organics' removal at higher flows in a few instances. Additionally, as the residence time decreased, the concentration of organics and the pH negatively influenced organics removal.

Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-04-013

Full Text: PDF

[1] Ahmed, M. E., Al-Haddad, A., Mydlarczyk, A., & Aba, A. (2019). The Presence and Distribution of Radioactivity and Radionuclides in Kuwait Wastewater Treatment Plants. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44(10), 8779–8786. doi:10.1007/s13369-019-04076-2.
[2] Al-Matouq, A., Ahmed, M. E., Khajah, M., & Al-Yaseen, R. (2024). Assessment of seasonal variations of volatile organic compounds in raw and treated wastewater in Kuwait. Desalination and Water Treatment, 318, 100377. doi:10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100377.
[3] NRC. (2012). Water Reuse: Potential for Expanding the Nation's Water Supply Through Reuse of Municipal Wastewater. National Research Council: Committee on the Assessment of Water Reuse as an Approach to Meeting Future Water Supply Needs. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., United States.
[4] Bartram, J., Baum, R., Coclanis, P. A., Gute, D. M., Kay, D., McFadyen, S., Pond, K., Robertson, W., & Rouse, M. J. (2015). Routledge handbook of water and health. Routledge Handbook of Water and Health. Routledge, New Jersey, United States. doi:10.4324/9781315693606.
[5] Kobayashi, D., & Matsumoto, H. (2019). Kinetics analysis for development of a rate constant estimation model for ultrasonic degradation reaction in the presence of particles. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 74, 571–576. doi:10.3303/CET1974096.
[6] Nasseri, S., Vaezi, F., Mahvi, A., Nabizadeh, R., & Haddadi, S. (2006). Determination of the ultrasonic effectiveness in advanced wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 3(2), 109–116.
[7] Al-Juboori, R., & Bowtell, L. (2020). Ultrasound Technology Integration into Drinking Water Treatment Train. Sonochemical Reactions. IntechOpen, Rijeka, Croatia. doi:10.5772/intechopen.88124.
[8] Kobayashi, D., Honma, C., Matsumoto, H., Takahashi, T., Shimada, Y., Kuroda, C., Otake, K., & Shono, A. (2014). Effects of ultrasonic frequency and initial concentration on degradation of methylene blue. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 53(7 SPEC. ISSUE), 3. doi:10.7567/JJAP.53.07KE03.
[9] Dehghani, M. H., Mahvi, A. H., Najafpoor, A. A., & Azam, K. (2007). Investigating the potential of using acoustic frequency on the degradation of linear alkylbenzen sulfonates from aqueous solution. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A, 8(9), 1462–1468. doi:10.1631/jzus.2007.A1462.
[10] Ayyildiz, O., Peters, R. W., & Anderson, P. R. (2007). Sonolytic degradation of halogenated organic compounds in groundwater: Mass transfer effects. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 14(2), 163–172. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2006.04.004.
[11] Maleki, A., Mahvi, A. H., Mesdaghinia, A., & Naddafi, K. (2007). Degradation and toxicity reduction of phenol by ultrasound waves. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia, 21(1), 33–38. doi:10.4314/bcse.v21i1.61368.
[12] Mahvi, A. H., . M. H. D., & . F. V. (2005). Ultrasonic Technology Effectiveness in Total Coliforms Disinfection of Water. Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(5), 856–858. doi:10.3923/jas.2005.856.858.
[13] Mahvi, A. H. (2009). Application of ultrasonic technology for water and wastewater treatment. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 38(2), 1–17.
[14] Yadav N, K. R. (2014). Effect of Two Waves of Ultrasonic on Waste Water Treatment. Journal of Chemical Engineering & Process Technology, 5(3), 1. doi:10.4172/2157-7048.1000193.
[15] Wang, N., Li, L., Wang, K., Huang, X., Han, Y., Ma, X., Wang, M., Lv, X., & Bai, X. (2023). Study and Application Status of Ultrasound in Organic Wastewater Treatment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(21), 15524. doi:10.3390/su152115524.
[16] Ang, W. L., McHugh, P. J., & Symes, M. D. (2022). Sonoelectrochemical processes for the degradation of persistent organic pollutants. Chemical Engineering Journal, 444, 136573. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.136573.
[17] Son, Y. (2016). Advanced oxidation processes using ultrasound technology for water and wastewater treatment. Handbook of Ultrasonics and Sonochemistry, 711–732. doi:10.1007/978-981-287-278-4_53.
[18] Wu, T. Y., Guo, N., Teh, C. Y., & Hay, J. X. W. (2013). Applications of Ultrasound Technology in Environmental Remediation. Advances in Ultrasound Technology for Environmental Remediation, 13–93. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5533-8_3.
[19] Mahamuni, N. N., & Adewuyi, Y. G. (2010). Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) involving ultrasound for waste water treatment: A review with emphasis on cost estimation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 17(6), 990–1003. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.09.005.
[20] Peters, D. (2001). Sonolytic degradation of volatile pollutants in natural ground water: Conclusions from a model study. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 8(3), 221–226. doi:10.1016/S1350-4177(01)00080-3.
[21] Ghosh, S., & Sahu, M. (2024). Ultrasound for the degradation of endocrine disrupting compounds in aqueous solution: A review on mechanisms, influence of operating parameters and cost estimation. Chemosphere, 349, 140864. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140864.
[22] Yang, N., Jun, B. M., Choi, J. S., Park, C. M., Jang, M., Son, A., Nam, S. N., & Yoon, Y. (2024). Ultrasonic treatment of dye chemicals in wastewater: A review. Chemosphere, 354, 141676. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141676.
[23] Flndlk, S. (2018). Treatment of petroleum refinery effluent using ultrasonic irradiation. Polish Journal of Chemical Technology, 20(4), 20–25. doi:10.2478/pjct-2018-0049.
[24] Gogate, P. R., & Pandit, A. B. (2004). A review of imperative technologies for wastewater treatment I: Oxidation technologies at ambient conditions. Advances in Environmental Research, 8(3–4), 501–551. doi:10.1016/S1093-0191(03)00032-7.
[25] Elgarahy, A. M., Eloffy, M. G., Priya, A. K., Yogeshwaran, V., Elwakeel, K. Z., Yang, Z., & Lopez-Maldonado, E. A. (2024). A review on the synergistic efficacy of sonication-assisted water treatment process with special attention given to microplastics. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 206, 524–552. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2024.05.027.
[26] Sponza, D. T., & Oztekin, R. (2010). Destruction of some more and less hydrophobic PAHs and their toxicities in a petrochemical industry wastewater with sonication in Turkey. Bioresource Technology, 101(22), 8639–8648. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.124.
[27] Lakshmi, N. J., Surabhi, P., Gogate, P. R., & Pandit, A. B. (2024). Treatment of Bio-Refractory Real Effluent from Polymer Processing Industry Using Cavitation-Based Hybrid Treatment Techniques. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 49(6), 7893–7912. doi:10.1007/s13369-023-08478-1.
[28] Baştürk, E. (2024). UV- and US-Based Oxidation of a Triazine Azo Dye (Reactive Red 120): Operational Parameters, Kinetics, Water Matrix Effect, Predominant Radicals, and Energy Efficiency. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 49(6), 7829–7849. doi:10.1007/s13369-023-08479-0.
[29] Pakhale, V. D., & Gogate, P. R. (2021). Removal of Rhodamine 6G from Industrial Wastewater Using Combination Approach of Adsorption Followed by Sonication. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 46(7), 6473–6484. doi:10.1007/s13369-020-05074-5.
[30] Sivakumar, M., & Pandit, A. B. (2002). Wastewater treatment: A novel energy efficient hydrodynamic cavitational technique. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 9(3), 123–131. doi:10.1016/S1350-4177(01)00122-5.
[31] Moholkar, V. S., Rekveld, S., & Warmoeskerken, M. M. C. G. (2000). Modeling of the acoustic pressure fields and the distribution of the cavitation phenomena in a dual frequency sonic processor. Ultrasonics, 38(1), 666–670. doi:10.1016/S0041-624X(99)00204-8.
[32] Vergara, L., Nickel, K., & Neis, U. (2012). Optimisation of Assets by Ultrasound to Achieve Lowest Operational Costs. 6th European Waste Water Management Conference & Exhibition, 1–18.
[33] Cetinkaya, S. G., Morcali, M. H., Akarsu, S., Ziba, C. A., & Dolaz, M. (2018). Comparison of classic Fenton with ultrasound Fenton processes on industrial textile wastewater. Sustainable Environment Research, 28(4), 165–170. doi:10.1016/j.serj.2018.02.001.
[34] APHA. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., United States.
[35] Oliveira, J. F. de, Fia, R., Fia, F. R. L., Rodrigues, F. N., Matos, M. P. de, & Siniscalchi, L. A. B. (2020). Principal component analysis as a criterion for monitoring variable organic load of swine wastewater in integrated biological reactors UASB, SABF and HSSF-CW. Journal of Environmental Management, 262, 110386. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110386.
[36] Tang, Z., Liu, M., Yi, L., Guo, H., Ouyang, T., Yin, H., & Li, M. (2019). Source apportionment and health risk assessment of heavy metals in Eastern Guangdong municipal solid waste. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(22), 4755. doi:10.3390/app9224755.
[37] Wang, J., Wang, Z., Vieira, C. L. Z., Wolfson, J. M., Pingtian, G., & Huang, S. (2019). Review on the treatment of organic pollutants in water by ultrasonic technology. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 55, 273–278. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.01.017.
[38] Zhou, X., Zhou, X., Wang, C., & Zhou, H. (2023). Environmental and human health impacts of volatile organic compounds: A perspective review. Chemosphere, 313, 137489. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137489.
[39] David, E., & Niculescu, V. C. (2021). Volatile organic compounds (Vocs) as environmental pollutants: Occurrence and mitigation using nanomaterials. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 13147. doi:10.3390/ijerph182413147.
[40] Wang, M., Ateia, M., Awfa, D., & Yoshimura, C. (2021). Regrowth of bacteria after light-based disinfection ” What we know and where we go from here. Chemosphere, 268, 128850. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128850.
[41] Collivignarelli, M. C., Abbí , A., Benigna, I., Sorlini, S., & Torretta, V. (2018). Overview of the main disinfection processes for wastewater and drinking water treatment plants. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(1), 86. doi:10.3390/su10010086.
[42] Suslick, K. S., Mdleleni, M. M., & Ries, J. T. (1997). Chemistry induced by hydrodynamic cavitation. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 119(39), 9303–9304. doi:10.1021/ja972171i.
[43] Patidar, R., & Srivastava, V. C. (2020). Mechanistic insight into ultrasound-induced enhancement of electrochemical oxidation of ofloxacin: Multi-response optimization and cost analysis. Chemosphere, 257, 127121. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127121.
[44] Tran, N., Drogui, P., Brar, S. K., & De Coninck, A. (2017). Synergistic effects of ultrasounds in the sonoelectrochemical oxidation of pharmaceutical carbamazepine pollutant. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 34, 380–388. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.014.
[45] Yin, C., Ye, T., Yu, Y., Li, W., & Ren, Q. (2019). Detection of hydroxyl radicals in sonoelectrochemical system. Microchemical Journal, 144, 369–376. doi:10.1016/j.microc.2018.09.025.
[46] Gujar, S. K., Gogate, P. R., Kanthale, P., Pandey, R., Thakre, S., & Agrawal, M. (2021). Combined oxidation processes based on ultrasound, hydrodynamic cavitation and chemical oxidants for treatment of real industrial wastewater from cellulosic fiber manufacturing sector. Separation and Purification Technology, 257, 117888. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117888.
[47] Wen, H., Cheng, D., Chen, Y., Yue, W., & Zhang, Z. (2024). Review on ultrasonic technology enhanced biological treatment of wastewater. Science of the Total Environment, 925, 171260. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171260.
[48] Shi, H., Wang, Q., Ni, J., Xu, Y., Song, N., & Gao, M. (2020). Highly efficient removal of amoxicillin from water by three-dimensional electrode system within granular activated carbon as particle electrode. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 38, 101656. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101656.
[49] Patidar, R., & Srivastava, V. C. (2022). Ultrasound-assisted electrochemical treatment of cosmetic industry wastewater: Mechanistic and detoxification analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 422, 126842. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126842.
[50] Mortezazadeh, F., Nejatzadeh, F., Eslamifar, M., & Gholami-Borujeni, F. (2024). Enhancing Disinfection Efficiency of Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent: The Role of ZnO Nanoparticles in Ultrasonic and UV-C Processes. Nano, 19(2), 2350100. doi:10.1142/S179329202350100X.
[51] Thokchom, B., Qiu, P., Cui, M., Park, B., Pandit, A. B., & Khim, J. (2017). Magnetic Pd@Fe3O4 composite nanostructure as recoverable catalyst for sonoelectrohybrid degradation of Ibuprofen. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 34, 262–272. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.05.030.
[52] Dominguez, C. M., Oturan, N., Romero, A., Santos, A., & Oturan, M. A. (2018). Lindane degradation by electrooxidation process: Effect of electrode materials on oxidation and mineralization kinetics. Water Research, 135, 220–230. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.037.
[53] Gibson, J. H., Hon, H., Farnood, R., Droppo, I. G., & Seto, P. (2009). Effects of ultrasound on suspended particles in municipal wastewater. Water Research, 43(8), 2251–2259. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.024.
[54] Yadav, M., Gole, V. L., Sharma, J., & Yadav, R. K. (2022). Biologically treated industrial wastewater disinfection using the synergy of low-frequency ultrasound and H2O2/O3. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 20(2), 889–898. doi:10.1007/s40201-022-00829-8.
[55] Lazarotto, J. S., Júnior, E. P. M., Medeiros, R. C., Volpatto, F., & Silvestri, S. (2022). Sanitary sewage disinfection with ultraviolet radiation and ultrasound. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(11), 11531–11538. doi:10.1007/s13762-021-03764-7.
[56] Naddeo, V., Cesaro, A., Mantzavinos, D., Fatta-Kassinos, D., & Belgiorno, V. (2014). Water and wastewater disinfection by ultrasound irradiation-a critical review. Global Nest Journal, 16(3), 561–577. doi:10.30955/gnj.001350.
[57] Vázquez-López, M., Amabilis-Sosa, L. E., Moeller-Chávez, G. E., Roé-Sosa, A., Neumann, P., & Vidal, G. (2019). Evaluation of the ultrasound effect on treated municipal wastewater. Environmental Technology (United Kingdom), 40(27), 3568–3577. doi:10.1080/09593330.2018.1481889.

Publication Start Year:	2015
JCR 2023 Impact Factor (IF):	4.3
JIF QUARTILE:	Q1
SJR 2023 Quartile:	Q1
Acceptance Rate:	27%
Review Speed (Average):	76 days
Issue Per Year:	12
Number of Volumes:	10
Number of Issues:	107
Number of Articles:	1552
Number of Reviewers:	3417
Number of Contributors:	3604
Contributing Countries:	86
No. of WoS Citations:	7986
WoS h-index:	34
Scopus CiteScore:	7.0
No. of Google Citations:	17324
Google h-index:	47
Google i10-index:	393
Abstract Views:	5,819,908
PDF Download:	3,790,637

Treatment of Industrial Wastewater of Variable Quality Using Ultrasound Irradiation

Authors

Downloads

Login

Publisher and Affiliated Societies

Publisher & Affiliated Societies

Indexing & Abstracting

SidebarMenu

Journal Imprint

Journal Imprint

Journal Metrics

IndexedBy

Indexed In

Follow us

Follow Us

Most Cited Articles

The ITB Unit Hydrograph Method: A Novel Approach to User-Defined Unit Hydrograph Development (Part II)

Sustainable Interlocking Blocks Containing Sugarcane Bagasse Ash: Structural Integrity, Cost Efficiency, and Environmental Benefits

Design a No-Fine Concrete Using Epoxy in Pavement

Energy Optimization in Residential Buildings: Evaluating PCM-CLT Wall Systems Across U.S. Climate Zones

Revolutionizing Recycled Aggregate Concrete: A Dual Approach Using HCl Treatment and Silica Fume

visitors

Analytics

Information

Address

Contact Info: