Dynamic Analysis of MICP-Stabilized Soil and Liquefiable Soil With Varying Salinity Levels

Nur A. Diana; Ria A. Aryani Soemitro; Januarti J. Ekaputri; Trihanyndio R. Satrya; Dwa D. Warnana

doi:10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-04-010

Authors

Nur A. Diana Department of Civil Engineering, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Surabaya,, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8442-3064
Ria A. Aryani Soemitro
ria@ce.its.ac.id
Department of Civil Engineering, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Surabaya,, Indonesia
Januarti J. Ekaputri Department of Civil Engineering, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Surabaya,, Indonesia
Trihanyndio R. Satrya Department of Civil Engineering, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Surabaya,, Indonesia
Dwa D. Warnana Department of Geophysical Engineering, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Surabaya,, Indonesia

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2025): April

Research Articles

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

This study investigates the liquefaction potential of soils at Yogyakarta International Airport (YIA), a high-risk seismic zone, and evaluates the efficiency of carbonate precipitation driven by microbial activity (MICP) stabilization under varying salinity situations. The purposes include understanding the dynamic response of natural and MICP-treated soils to seismic loads and assessing the role of salinity in soil behavior. Triaxial cyclic testing was conducted on remolded soil samples at a very loose density (Dr = 10%) to simulate field situations, using Bacillus Safensis. Microbes and a biocementing procedure enhanced with 35% fly ash. Salinity levels of 0%, 1%, 2%, and 3.4% were tested by curing for 28 days. The outcomes reveal that untreated soils liquefied inside of 4–6 cycles at ru = 0.8 for 0%, 2%, and 3.4% salinity. In contrast, 1% salinity delayed liquefaction to 14 cycles, thereby enhancing soil resistance. MICP-treated soils showed enhanced stiffness, decreased compressive strain, and extended resistance to liquefaction under dynamic loads. SEM and XRD analyses verified CaCO₃deposition, particle bonding, and decreased pore space. The novelty lies in demonstrating the significant role of salinity in enhancing the MICP procedure and improving soil stability, providing a sustainable solution for mitigating liquefaction risks in saline coastal regions.

Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-04-010

Full Text: PDF

[1] Amipour, S., Khashila, M., Bayoumi, A., Karray, M., & Chekired, M. (2022). Specimens size effect D/H on cyclic behaviour and liquefaction potential of clean sand. Acta Geotechnica, 17(5), 2047–2057. doi:10.1007/s11440-021-01339-x.
[2] Farooq, M. A., & Nimbalkar, S. (2024). Monotonic and cyclic triaxial testing of untreated and polyurethane-treated soil and soil–rubber mixtures. Acta Geotechnica, 19(2), 605–630. doi:10.1007/s11440-023-02100-2.
[3] Khashila, M., Hussien, M. N., Chekired, M., & Karray, M. (2021). On the Dynamic Soil Behavior under Triaxial and Simple Shear Modes. International Journal of Geomechanics, 21(8), 04021134. doi:10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002085.
[4] Wang, W., He, X., Wu, S., & Chu, J. (2024). Presence of Mg-calcite and its influence on MICP and EICP processes. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.09.045.
[5] Smitha, S., & Rangaswamy, K. (2020). Effect of Biopolymer Treatment on Pore Pressure Response and Dynamic Properties of Silty Sand. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 32(8), 04020217. doi:10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003285.
[6] Smitha, S., Rangaswamy, K., & Keerthi, D. S. (2021). Triaxial test behaviour of silty sands treated with agar biopolymer. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 15(4), 484–495. doi:10.1080/19386362.2019.1679441.
[7] Kassas, K., Adamidis, O., & Anastasopoulos, I. (2021). Shallow strip foundations subjected to earthquake-induced soil liquefaction: Validation, modelling uncertainties, and boundary effects. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 147, 106719. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106719.
[8] Zhu, L., Yang, Q., Luo, L., & Cui, S. (2022). Pore-Water Pressure Model for Carbonate Fault Materials Based on Cyclic Triaxial Tests. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 1–12. doi:10.3389/feart.2022.842765.
[9] Zhu, M., Kong, F., Li, Y., Li, M., Zhang, J., & Xi, M. (2020). Effects of moisture and salinity on soil dissolved organic matter and ecological risk of coastal wetland. Environmental Research, 187, 109659. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109659.
[10] Rifa'i, A., Fathani, T. F., & Adi, A. D. (2024). Post-Earthquake Liquefaction Vulnerability Mapping by Swedish Weight Sounding and Standard Penetration Test. Civil Engineering Journal, 10(7), 2216-2232. doi:10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-07-09.
[11] Xu, K., Huang, M., Liu, Z., Cui, M., & Li, S. (2023). Mechanical properties and disintegration behavior of EICP-reinforced sea sand subjected to drying-wetting cycles. Biogeotechnics, 1(2), 100019. doi:10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100019.
[12] Fu, T., Saracho, A. C., & Haigh, S. K. (2023). Microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) for soil strengthening: A comprehensive review. Biogeotechnics, 1(1), 100002. doi:10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100002.
[13] Yu, X., Tan, Y., Song, W., Kemeny, J., Qi, S., Zheng, B., & Guo, S. (2024). Damage evolution of rock-encased-backfill structure under stepwise cyclic triaxial loading. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 16(2), 597–615. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.11.015.
[14] Voyagaki, E., Kishida, T., Aldulaimi, R. F., & Mylonakis, G. (2023). Integration and calibration of UBCSAND model for drained monotonic and cyclic triaxial compression of aggregates. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 171, 107978. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107978.
[15] Wang, P., Zhang, N., Wei, Q., Xu, X., Cui, G., Li, A., Yang, S., & Kan, J. (2024). Mechanical responses of anchoring structure under triaxial cyclic loading. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 16(2), 545–560. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.04.020.
[16] Molina-Gómez, F., Viana da Fonseca, A., Ferreira, C., & Caicedo, B. (2023). Improvement of cyclic liquefaction resistance induced by partial saturation: An interpretation using wave-based approaches. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 167, 107819. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107819.
[17] Jain, A., Mittal, S., & Shukla, S. K. (2023). Liquefaction proneness of stratified sand-silt layers based on cyclic triaxial tests. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 15(7), 1826-1845. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.09.015.
[18] Diana, N. A., Soemitro, R. A. A., Ekaputri, J. J., Satrya, T. R., & Warnana, D. D. (2024). The influence of variations in salinity levels on the biocementing process on soil improvement of liquefaction potential. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1372(1), 012071. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1372/1/012071.
[19] Song, Z., Wu, C., Li, Z., & Shen, D. (2024). Fracture sealing based on microbially induced carbonate precipitation and its engineering applications: A review. Biogeotechnics, 2(4), 100100. doi:10.1016/j.bgtech.2024.100100.
[20] Weng, Y., Lai, H., Zheng, J., Cui, M., Chen, Y., Xu, Z., Jiang, W., Zhang, J., & Song, Y. (2024). Effect of acid type on biomineralization of soil using crude soybean urease solution. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 5135-5146. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.09.017.
[21] Kuo, C. H., Huang, J. Y., Lin, C. M., Chen, C. Te, & Wen, K. L. (2021). Near-surface frequency-dependent nonlinear damping ratio observation of ground motions using SMART1. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 147, 106798. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106798.
[22] Wang, Y., Soga, K., DeJong, J. T., & Kabla, A. J. (2021). Effects of Bacterial Density on Growth Rate and Characteristics of Microbial-Induced CaCO3 Precipitates: Particle-Scale Experimental Study. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 147(6), 04021036. doi:10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002509.
[23] Mijic, Z., Bray, J. D., Riemer, M. F., Rees, S. D., & Cubrinovski, M. (2021). Cyclic and monotonic simple shear testing of native Christchurch silty soil. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 148, 106834. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106834.
[24] Quintero, J., Gomes, R. C., Rios, S., Ferreira, C., & Viana da Fonseca, A. (2023). Liquefaction assessment based on numerical simulations and simplified methods: A deep soil deposit case study in the Greater Lisbon. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 169. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107866.
[25] Peellage, W. H., Fatahi, B., & Rasekh, H. (2023). Assessment of cyclic deformation and critical stress amplitude of jointed rocks via cyclic triaxial testing. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 15(6), 1370–1390. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.02.001.
[26] Dejong, J. T., Soga, K., Kavazanjian, E., Burns, S., Van Paassen, L. A., AL Qabany, A., Aydilek, A., Bang, S. S., Burbank, M., Caslake, L. F., Chen, C. Y., Cheng, X., Chu, J., Ciurli, S., Esnault-Filet, A., Fauriel, S., Hamdan, N., Hata, T., Inagaki, Y., ... Weaver, T. (2013). Biogeochemical processes and geotechnical applications: Progress, opportunities and challenges. Geotechnique, 63(4), 287–301. doi:10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.017.
[27] Yang, C., Lv, D., Jiang, S., Lin, H., Sun, J., Li, K., & Sun, J. (2021). Soil salinity regulation of soil microbial carbon metabolic function in the Yellow River Delta, China. Science of the Total Environment, 790, 148258. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148258.
[28] Diana, N. A., Soemitro, R. A. A., Ekaputri, J. J., Satrya, T. R., & Warnana, D. D. (2024). Evaluation of Liquefaction Risk Based on Soil Grain Size Characteristics and Standard Penetration Test (N-SPT) Resistance Results Case Study of Yogyakarta International Airport. Publication of Civil Engineering Orientation Research (Protection), 6(1), 51–58. doi:10.26740/proteksi.v6n1.p51-58. (In Indonesian).
[29] Tsuchida, H. (1970). Prediction and countermeasure against the liquefaction in sand deposits. Abstract of the seminar in the Port and Harbor Research Institute, Kanagawa, Japan.
[30] Miyamoto, M., Tuchida, H., Sakuraya, N., Omote, T., Iwasaki, H., & Namiki, A. (1988). Changes of liver function following prolonged general anesthesia. The Journal of Japan Society for Clinical Anesthesia, 8(3), 284-288.
[31] Gitanjali Kennedy, A., Ge, L., & Jhuo, Y.-S. (2024). Experimental Study of Ground Improvement Using Enzyme Induced Calcite Precipitation (EICP). Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication, 10(51), 1918–1923. doi:10.3208/jgssp.v10.os-40-04.
[32] Xiao, Y., He, X., Zaman, M., Ma, G., & Zhao, C. (2022). Review of Strength Improvements of Biocemented Soils. International Journal of Geomechanics, 22(11), 1–23. doi:10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002565.
[33] Yao, C. R., Wang, B., Liu, Z. Q., Fan, H., Sun, F. H., & Chang, X. H. (2019). Evaluation of liquefaction potential in saturated sand under different drainage boundary conditions-An energy approach. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(11), 411. doi:10.3390/jmse7110411.
[34] Zhang, J., Bilotta, E., Sun, Q., & Yuan, Y. (2024). Numerical simulation and parametric analysis on a shallow tunnel in liquefiable ground subject to multiple shakings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 183, 108802. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108802.
[35] Liu, C., Yuan, Y., He, W., & Zhang, L. (2019). Durability analysis of seashore saline soil bound with a slag compound binder. Soils and Foundations, 59(5), 1456–1467. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2019.06.005.
[36] Mustafa, H., Maulana, A., Irfan, U. R., & Tonggiroh, A. (2023). The geoelectric approach to analyzing the profile of post-mining nickel laterite deposits in the Motui District, North Konawe Regency, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1134(1), 012035. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1134/1/012035.
[37] Rahman, M. M., Hora, R. N., Ahenkorah, I., Beecham, S., Karim, M. R., & Iqbal, A. (2020). State-of-the-art review of microbial-induced calcite precipitation and its sustainability in engineering applications. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(15), 6281. doi:10.3390/SU12156281.
[38] Lai, H., Ding, X., Cui, M., Zheng, J., Chu, J., Chen, Z., & Zhang, J. (2024). A new bacterial concentration method for large-scale applications of biomineralization. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 16(12), 5109-5120. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.01.015.

Publication Start Year:	2015
JCR 2023 Impact Factor (IF):	4.3
JIF QUARTILE:	Q1
SJR 2023 Quartile:	Q1
Acceptance Rate:	27%
Review Speed (Average):	76 days
Issue Per Year:	12
Number of Volumes:	10
Number of Issues:	107
Number of Articles:	1552
Number of Reviewers:	3417
Number of Contributors:	3604
Contributing Countries:	86
No. of WoS Citations:	7986
WoS h-index:	34
Scopus CiteScore:	7.0
No. of Google Citations:	17324
Google h-index:	47
Google i10-index:	393
Abstract Views:	5,819,908
PDF Download:	3,790,637

Dynamic Analysis of MICP-Stabilized Soil and Liquefiable Soil With Varying Salinity Levels

Authors

Downloads

Login

Publisher and Affiliated Societies

Publisher & Affiliated Societies

Indexing & Abstracting

SidebarMenu

Journal Imprint

Journal Imprint

Journal Metrics

IndexedBy

Indexed In

Follow us

Follow Us

Most Cited Articles

The ITB Unit Hydrograph Method: A Novel Approach to User-Defined Unit Hydrograph Development (Part II)

Sustainable Interlocking Blocks Containing Sugarcane Bagasse Ash: Structural Integrity, Cost Efficiency, and Environmental Benefits

Design a No-Fine Concrete Using Epoxy in Pavement

Energy Optimization in Residential Buildings: Evaluating PCM-CLT Wall Systems Across U.S. Climate Zones

Revolutionizing Recycled Aggregate Concrete: A Dual Approach Using HCl Treatment and Silica Fume

visitors

Analytics

Information

Address

Contact Info: