Driving Economic Value: Assessing the Financial Impact of Dynamic Message Signs on Freeways
Downloads
Dynamic Message Signs (DMSs) are an integral feature of any Intelligent Transportation System (ITS), providing drivers with real-time information such as travel time, incidents, routes, and weather conditions. This study aims to estimate the economic impacts associated with DMS use for route choice, weather advisories, and work zone management on freeways. Several freeway locations with varying levels of traffic congestion were selected to ensure a comprehensive evaluation under diverse conditions. Travel time savings and speed reductions were used as performance metrics to assess Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) for each application. The findings show that DMSs yield substantial economic advantages across all use cases. For route guidance messages with a 35% diversion rate, the BCR was 1.032, indicating a cost-effective investment. Weather advisory messages recommending speed reduction achieved a notably higher BCR of 6.0, reflecting strong safety and financial benefits. Work zone applications using Portable Changeable Message Signs (PCMS) projected a BCR of 1.22. This study offers a data-driven justification for DMS deployment and contributes to the literature by focusing on financial performance, supporting strategic investment decisions beyond qualitative or operational assessments.
Downloads
[1] MUTCD. (2012). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Including Revision 1 Dated May 2012 and Revision 2 Dated May 2012. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, United States.
[2] Zhao, W., Quddus, M., Huang, H., Lee, J., & Ma, Z. (2019). Analyzing drivers’ preferences and choices for the content and format of variable message signs (VMS). Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 100, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.013.
[3] Abushattal, M., & Alhomaidat, F. (2025). Factors Associated with Travel Time Accuracy of Dynamic Message Signs for Route Choice. Future Transportation, 5(2), 53. doi:10.3390/futuretransp5020053.
[4] Kelarestaghi, K. B., Ermagun, A., Heaslip, K., & Rose, J. (2020). Choice of speed under compromised Dynamic Message Signs. PLoS ONE, 15(12 December), 243567. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243567.
[5] Zhang, Z., Akinci, B., & Qian, S. (2023). How effective is reducing traffic speed for safer work zones? Methodology and a case study in Pennsylvania. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 183, 106966. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2023.106966.
[6] Wu, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, N., & Rong, J. (2024). Effectiveness, influence mechanism and optimization strategies of variable message Sign: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 105, 116–137. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2024.06.028.
[7] Kwigizile, V., Oh, J. S., Van Houten, R., Lee, K., Kwayu, K. M., Abushattal, M., ... & Lyimo, S. (2022). Quantifying Effectiveness and Impacts of Digital Message Signs on Traffic Flow. No. SPR-1709, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, United States.
[8] Savolainen, P. T., Gates, T. J., Kassens-Noor, E., Megat-Johari, M. U., Megat-Johari, N., Decaminada, T., & Cai, M. (2021). Effectiveness of Crash Fact/Safety Message Signs on Dynamic Message Signs. No. 2019-0295, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, United States.
[9] Mahmud, A., Gayah, V. V., & Guler, S. I. (2025). Modeling economic impacts of transportation infrastructure in Pennsylvania considering spatial dependency across counties. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. doi:10.1016/j.ijtst.2025.01.006.
[10] Farrag, S. G., Outay, F., Yasar, A. U. H., & El-Hansali, M. Y. (2020). Evaluating active traffic management (ATM) strategies under non-recurring congestion: Simulation-based with benefit cost analysis case study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(15), 6027. doi:10.3390/su12156027.
[11] Edara, P., Sun, C., Keller, J. D. C., & Hou, Y. (2012). Evaluating the Benefits of Dynamic Message Signs on Missouri’s Rural Corridors. Final Report Prepared for Missouri Department of Transportation, Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, United States.
[12] New York State Thruway Authority. (2011). Guidelines for Use of Variable Message Signs (VMS). New York State Thruway Authority, Albany, United States.
[13] Nićiforović, D. (2024). Discrepancy Of Utilization of Traffic Control Devices According to Applicable Regulations. XIX International Conference Road Safety in Local Community, 606–614. doi:10.46793/rsaflc24.606n.
[14] Alhomaidat, F., Hasan, R. A., Hanandeh, S., & Alhajyaseen, W. (2023). Using driving simulator to study the effect of crash fact signs on speeding behaviour along freeways. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 30(1), 15–25. doi:10.1080/17457300.2022.2097698.
[15] Reinolsmann, N., Alhajyaseen, W., Brijs, T., Pirdavani, A., Ross, V., Hussain, Q., & Brijs, K. (2022). Delay or travel time information? The impact of advanced traveler information systems on drivers’ behavior before freeway work zones. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 87, 454–476. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2022.05.001.
[16] Reinolsmann, N., Alhajyaseen, W., Brijs, T., Pirdavani, A., Hussain, Q., & Brijs, K. (2021). Sandstorm animations on rural expressways: The impact of variable message sign strategies on driver behavior in low visibility conditions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 78, 308–325. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2021.02.015.
[17] Almallah, M. S., Hussain, Q., Alhajyaseen, W. K. M., & Brijs, T. (2020). Improved Road Safety at Work Zones using Advanced Traveler Information Systems. University of the Future: Re-Imagining Research and Higher Education, 266. doi:10.29117/quarfe.2020.0243.
[18] Haghani, A., Hamedi, M., Fish, R., & Nouruzi, A. (2013). Evaluation of dynamic message signs and their potential impact on traffic flow. No. MD-13-SP109B4C, Maryland. State Highway Administration, Baltimore, United States.
[19] Luoma, J., Rämä, P., Penttinen, M., & Anttila, V. (2000). Effects of variable message signs for slippery road conditions on reported driver behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 3(2), 75–84. doi:10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00017-6.
[20] Song, M., Wang, J.-H., Cheung, S., & Keceli, M. (2016). Assessing and Mitigating the Impacts of Dynamic Message Signs on Highway Traffic. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 6(1), 1–12. doi:10.7708/ijtte.2016.6(1).01.
[21] Banerjee, S., Jeihani, M., Brown, D. D., & Ahangari, S. (2020). Comprehensive Analysis of Dynamic Message Sign Impact on Driver Behavior: A Random Forest Approach. Urban Science, 4(4), 49. doi:10.3390/urbansci4040049.
[22] Foo, S., & Abdulhai, B. (2006, September). Evaluating the impacts of changeable message signs on traffic diversion. 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, 17-20 September, 2006, Toronto, ON, Canada.
[23] Huo, H., & Levinson, D. (2006). Effectiveness of VMS Using Empirical Loop Detector Data. California Partners for Advanced Transportation Technology, Berkeley, United States.
[24] Haghani, A., Hamedi, M., Fish, R., & Nouruzi, A. (2013). Evaluation of dynamic message signs and their potential impact on traffic flow (No. MD-13-SP109B4C). State Highway Administration. Office of Policy & Research, Maryland, United States.
[25] Schiesel, R. B., & Demetsky, M. J. (2000). Evaluation of traveler diversion due to en-route information. No. UVA/29472/CE00/103, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States.
[26] Maze, T., Kamyab, A., & Schrock, S. (2000). Evaluation of work zone speed reduction measures. Iowa State University, Ames, United States.
[27] Bai, Y., Finger, K., & Li, Y. (2010). Analyzing motorists’ responses to temporary signage in highway work zones. Safety Science, 48(2), 215–221. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.08.005.
[28] Devices, S. (2006). Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1988. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1988, 1–5. doi:10.3141/1988-01.
[29] Li, Y., Chan, M. S. L., Firman, U., Finger, K., Mills, M. M., Bai, Y., ... & Perlmutter, D. D. (2009). Improving highway work zone safety. Final Report, KU Transportation Research Institute, Kansas Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, United States.
[30] Hogema, J. H., & Van Der Horst, R. (1997). Evaluation of A16 motorway fog-signaling system with respect to driving behavior. Transportation Research Record, 1573(1573), 63–67. doi:10.3141/1573-10.
[31] Knickerbocker, S., Sassani, A., & Hans, Z. (2021). Evaluation of Road Weather Messages on DMS Based on Roadside Pavement Sensors (No. MN 2021-25). Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minnesota, United States.
[32] Rämä, P. (2001). Effects of weather-controlled variable message signing on driver behaviour. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
[33] Lappin, J. (2008). Intelligent Transportation Systems Benefits, Costs, Deployment, and Lessons Learned 2008 Update. Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, United States.
[34] Özbay, K. M. A., Xiao, W., Jaiswal, G., Bartin, B., Kachroo, P., & Baykal-Gursoy, M. (2009). Evaluation of incident management strategies and technologies using an integrated traffic/incident management simulation. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 2(2–3), 155–186. doi:10.1504/WRITR.2009.023305.
[35] Sandt, A., Al-Deek, H., Rogers, J. H., & Kayes, M. I. (2017). Using agency surveys and benefit–cost analysis to evaluate highway advisory radio as regional traveler information and communication tool. Transportation Research Record, 2616(1), 81–90. doi:10.3141/2616-09.
[36] Oh, J. S., Kwigizile, V., Sun, Z., Clark, M. L., Kurdi, A. H., & Wiersma, M. J. (2015). Costs and benefits of MDOT intelligent transportation system deployments (No. RC-1631). Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, United States.
[37] North Carolina Department of Transportation. (2013). Evaluation of Six Dynamic Message Signs on I-40 and I-26 in Buncombe and Henderson Counties. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, United States.
[38] Federal Highway Administration. (2023). Use Case: Managed Lanes Benefit-Cost Analysis. Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, United States.
[39] Elvik, R. (2014). Speed and road safety-new models. TØI report, (1296/2014), Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway.
[40] Streff, F. M. (1994). Societal Costs of Traffic Crashes and Crime in Michigan: A Four-year Update. Transportation Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States.
[41] Jeihani, M., & Ardeshiri, A. (2013). Exploring travelers' behavior in response to dynamic message signs (DMS) using a driving simulator (No. MD-13-SP209B4K). State Highway Administration. Office of Policy & Research, Maryland, United States.
[42] Shealy, T., Kryschtal, P., Franczek, K., & Katz, B. J. (2020). Driver response to dynamic message sign safety campaign messages (No. FHWA/VTRC 20-R16). Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC), Charlottesville, United States.
[43] Bai, Y., Yang, Y., & Li, Y. (2015). Determining the effective location of a portable changeable message sign on reducing the risk of truck-related crashes in work zones. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 83, 197–202. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.024.
[44] Huang, Y., & Bai, Y. (2019). Driver responses to graphic-aided portable changeable message signs in highway work zones. Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, 11(6), 661–682. doi:10.1080/19439962.2018.1463336.
[45] Jalaei, F., & Jrade, A. (2014). Integrating BIM with green building certification system, energy analysis, and cost estimating tools to conceptually design sustainable buildings. Construction Research Congress 2014: Construction in a Global Network, 140-149.
- Authors retain all copyrights. It is noticeable that authors will not be forced to sign any copyright transfer agreements.
- This work (including HTML and PDF Files) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
