Seismic Performance Assessment of Existing RC Frames with Different Ultimate Concrete Strains

Rishath Sabrin, Mohammad Al Amin Siddique, Md. K. Sohel


In recent years, because of the older version code, inadequate design, lacks of construction supervision, change in loading pattern, damages and casualties of earthquakes or environmental degradation, buildings at risk need to be investigated frequently for safety purpose. To increase the strength and ductility capacities of deficient reinforced concrete (RC) beams, columns and beam-column joints, retrofitting may require. In this paper, a numerical investigation using nonlinear static pushover analysis is conducted to assess the seismic behavior of existing moment resisting RC frames. In numerical modeling, different plastic hinge lengths as well as different concrete ultimate strain conditions of RC members are considered. Pushover analysis has been carried out with the commercial software ETABS v.9.6.0 to evaluate structural behavior of RC frames located in a seismic region. Hinge properties simulating moment-rotation behavior of frame members considering different plastic hinge lengths as well as concrete ultimate strains are evaluated. Pushover curves are compared with each other to determine the plastic hinge length and strain values which provide better agreement with that of the default properties. Seismic performance criteria in terms of ductility, overstrength as well as response modification factor for frames are determined from pushover curves. From the analyses in general, the load carrying capacity as well as displacement at maximum lateral load and interstory drift index at any floor level of RC frames is assessed.


Concrete Strain; Pushover Analysis; Seismic Performance; Ductility Factor; Overstrength Factor; Interstory Drift Index.


ACI-318 (2014). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.

BSI 1997 (1997). Structural use of concrete. Code of practice for design and construction, BS 8110-1:1997, London, England: British Standards Institution.

BNBC-93 (1993). Bangladesh National Building Code, Housing & Building Research Institute and Bangladesh Standards & Testing Institution, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Haselton C. B., Liel A. B., Deierlein G. G., Dean B. S., and Chou J. H. “Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. I: Assessment of ductile moment frames”. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 137, No. 4 (2011): 481–491, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000318.

ASCE 7-02. (2003). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures: SEI/ASCE 7-02. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, USA.

ACI-318. (2002). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.

Un E., Erberik M., and Askan, A. “Performance Assessment of Turkish Residential Buildings for Seismic Damage and Loss Estimation”. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, Vol. 29, No. 2 (2015): 04014063, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000547.

Yalciner H., Sensoy S., and Eren O. “Seismic Performance Assessment of a Corroded 50-Year-Old Reinforced Concrete Building”. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 141, No. 12 (2015), doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001263.

Han R., Li Y., and Van de Lindt J. “Assessment of seismic performance of buildings with incorporation of aftershocks”. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, Vol. 29, No. 3 (2015), doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000596.

Dya A. F. C., and Oretaa A.W. C. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of soft story irregular buildings using pushover analysis”. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 125 (2015): 925 – 932, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.103.

Mosleh A., Rodrigues H., Varum H., Costa A., and Arêde A. “Seismic behavior of RC building structures designed according to current codes”. Structures, Vol. 7 (2016): 1-13,

Hosseini M., Hashemi B., and Safi Z. “Seismic design evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings for near-source earthquakes by using nonlinear time history analyses”. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 199 (2017):176–181, doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.225.

Morales-Gonza´lez M., and Vidot-Vega A. L. “Seismic response of reinforced concrete frames at different damage levels”. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 1 (March 2017): 63–77, doi: 10.1007/s40091-017-0149-x.

Hoffman E., and Richards P. “Efficiently implementing genetic optimization with nonlinear response history analysis of taller buildings”. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 140, No. 8 (2014), doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000943.

IBC-2006. (2006). International Building Code. International Code Council, Falls Church, VA.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. FEMA 356, 2006, Washington (DC), USA.

Hueste M., and Bai J. “Seismic retrofit of a reinforced concrete flat-slab structure: Part I-seismic performance evaluation”. Engineering Structures, Vol. 29 (2007): 1165–1177, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.07.023.

Krawinkler H., Lignos D., and Putman C. “Prediction of nonlinear response—Pushover analysis versus simplified nonlinear response history analysis”. Proc., Structures Congress (2011): 2228-2239, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, doi: 10.1061/41171(401)193.

El-Betar S. A. “Seismic performance of existing R.C. framed buildings”. HBRC Journal (2015),

Asprone D., Frascadore R., Ludovico M. D., Prota A. and Manfredi G. “Influence of strain rate on the seismic response of RC structures”. Engineering Structures, Vol. 35 (2012): 29–36, doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.025.

ATC-40. (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Building. ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, USA.

Golghate K., Baradiya V., and Sharma A. “Pushover analysis of 4 storey's reinforced concrete building”. International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology (IJLTET), Vol. 2, No. 3 (2013): 80-84, ISSN: 2278-621X.

Park R. and Dai R. “Ductility of doubly reinforced concrete beam sections”. ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 85, No. 2 (1988): 217-225, doi: 10.14359/2760.

Maghsoudi A. A. and Sharifi Y. “Ductility of high strength concrete heavily steel reinforced members”. Transaction A: Civil Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 4 (2009): 297-307.

Inel M. and Ozmen H. B. “Effects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings”. Engineering Structures, Vol.28, No. 11 (2006): 1494-1502, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.017.

Kent D. C. and Park R. “Flexural members with confined concrete”. Journal of the Structural Division, Proc. of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 97, No. ST7 (1971): 1969-1990.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. Washington (DC): FEMA 440, 2005.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). NEHRP Provisions for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Building. Washington (DC), USA: FEMA 273 and 274, 1997.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/cej-0309172


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Mohammad Al Amin Siddique

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.