Structural and Thermal Performance Assessment of Shipping Container as Post-Disaster Housing in Tropical Climates
Abstract
Shipping Containers (SC) are a viable option as temporary or permanent housing for disaster victims due to their modularity, strength, and availability in large quantities around the world. While SCs as alternative housing has been extensively explored, few studies have focused on the structural and thermal performance of SCs in a tropical monsoon climate. This paper aims to contribute to a better knowledge of SC building construction by (1) investigating the SCs structural performance when subjected to a variety of loads, including gravity, earthquake, and very strong typhoon, and (2) assessing the thermal performance in a hot and humid climate. The case of Leyte, Philippines, a hot, humid, and typhoon-frequented region, is considered in this study. To meet the objectives, two SCs were combined to build a single-family house. First, the structural strength of the SCs, including the effect of cuts and openings, were investigated using finite element analysis. Second, the thermal condition of the SC was compared using four models with different insulation materials: no insulation, PE foam insulation (R-12), slightly higher insulation (R-13 fiberglass batt), and very high insulation (R-49 fiberglass batt) through building energy simulation. The paper concludes that SCs have inherently high strength and can withstand strong wind and earthquake. Stresses due to cuts and openings were minimized when the cuts/openings were placed far from the corner posts. On the other hand, increasing insulation R-value did not improve the indoor thermal condition of the SCs. More work needs to be done on making SCs thermally comfortable in hot and humid climates.
Doi: 10.28991/cej-2021-03091735
Full Text: PDF
Keywords
References
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. “Special Report on Climate Change and Land.” (2019). Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/ (accessed on 16 May 2021).
MacLeod, David, Evan Easton-Calabria, Erin Coughlan de Perez, and Catalina Jaime. “Verification of Forecasts for Extreme Rainfall, Tropical Cyclones, Flood and Storm Surge over Myanmar and the Philippines.” Weather and Climate Extremes 33 (September 2021): 100325. doi:10.1016/j.wace.2021.100325.
Center for Excellence in Disaster Management & Humanitarian Assistance. “Philippines Disaster Management Handbook.” (2018). Available online: https://reliefweb.int/report/philippines/philippines-disaster-management-reference-handbook-march-2018 (accessed on 14 April 2020).
National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council. “Final Report: Effects of Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan).” (2013). Available online: http://ndrrmc.gov.ph/attachments/article/1329/FINAL_REPORT_re_Effects_of_Typhoon_YOLANDA_ HAIYAN_06-09NOV2013.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2021).
Esplanada, Jerry E. “DPWH Drops Construction of Last Two Bunkhouses.” (2014). Available online: https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/584797/dpwh-drops-construction-of-last-two-bunkhouses (accessed on 18 February 2021).
The Sphere Project. “Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response” (January 2011). doi:10.3362/9781908176202.
Del Mundo, Fernando. “Yolanda Bunkhouses Overpriced; Shelters Substandard, Too.” (2014). Available online: https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/558299/yolanda-bunkhouses-overpriced (accessed on 18 February 2021).
Macairan, Evelyn. “DPWH: Damaged Bunkhouses Not Permanent Shelters.” (2014). Available online: https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2014/12/09/1400628/dpwh-damaged-bunkhouses-not-permanent-shelters (accessed on 20 February 2021).
Ager, Maila. “Yolanda Bunkhouses Substandard, Not Overpriced–Senate Report.” (2014). Available online: https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/606159/yolanda-bunkhouses-substandard-not-overpriced-senate-report (accessed 20 February 2021).
Namin, Fardin Nezafati, Hamid Rez Askari, Sirous Ramesh, Seyed Masoud Mousavi Hassani, Esmat Khanmohammadi, and Heydar Ebrahimi. “Application of ANP Network Analysis Process Method in SWOT Model.” Civil Engineering Journal 5, no. 2 (February 26, 2019): 458. doi:10.28991/cej-2019-03091260.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TC 104. ISO 1496-1:1990 Series 1 Freight Containers - Specification and Testing - Part 1: General Cargo Containers for General Purposes; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland (1990).
Kotnik, Jure. “Container architecture: This book contains 6441 containers.” Barcelona: Links International (2008).
De Asis, J.S. “Potential of Container Housing in the Philippines.” Proceedings of the 14th SGRA Seminar on Urban-Rural Gap and Sustainability Shared Growth (April 26, 2012).
Peña, Jose A. and Schuzer, Kurt. “Design of Reusable Emergency Relief Housing Units using General-Purpose (GP) Shipping Containers.” International Journal of Engineering Research and Innovation 4 (February 2012): 55-64.
Tan, Cher Siang, and Philip C.H. Ling. “Shipping Container as Shelter Provision Solution for Post-Disaster Reconstruction.” Edited by Y.F. Huang, K.W. Tan, L. Ling, and K.H. Leong. E3S Web of Conferences 65 (2018): 08007. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/20186508007.
Zhang, Guomin, Sujeeva Setunge, and Stefanie van Elmpt. “Using Shipping Containers to Provide Temporary Housing in Post-Disaster Recovery: Social Case Studies.” Procedia Economics and Finance 18 (2014): 618–625. doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00983-6.
Obia, Ajah Ekpeni. “Architectural Adaptation of the Shipping Container for Housing the Internally Displaced Persons in South-South Nigeria Pages.” International Journal of Architecture, Engineering and Construction (December 1, 2020): 1-9. doi:10.7492/ijaec.2020.031.
Shelter Centre. “Transitional Shelter Standard.” (2009). Available online: https://www.sheltercluster.org/sites/default/files/ docs/Transitional%20Shelter%20Standards%202009.pdf (accessed on 15 March 2021).
Bernardo, Luís F. A., Luiz A. P. Oliveira, Miguel C. S. Nepomuceno, and Jorge M. A. Andrade. “Use of Refurbished Shipping Containers for the Construction of Housing Buildings: Details for the Structural Project.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 19, no. 5 (October 29, 2013): 628–646. doi:10.3846/13923730.2013.795185.
Giriunas, Kevin, Halil Sezen, and Rebecca B. Dupaix. “Evaluation, Modeling, and Analysis of Shipping Container Building Structures.” Engineering Structures 43 (October 2012): 48–57. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.001.
Andamon, M.M.D., Williamson, T.J., and Soebarto, V.I. “Perceptions and Expectations of Thermal Comfort in the Philippines.” Proceedings of Windsor 2006 Conference: Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings-Getting Them Right (27-30 April, 2006).
Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration. “Climate of the Philippines”. Available online: http://bagong.pagasa.dost.gov.ph/information/climate-philippines (accessed on 25 March 2020).
Ismail, K.M., Al-obaidi, A.M., Rahman, M.A., and Ahmad, M.I. “Container Architecture in the Hot-Humid Tropics: Potential and Constraints.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental Research and Technology: Exploring the Frontiers in Environmental Science and Technology Research; (May 27-29; 2015).
Energy.gov. “Types of Insulation.”. Available online: https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/weatherize/insulation/types-insulation (accessed on 25 March 2020).
Elrayies, Ghada Mohammad. “Thermal Performance Assessment of Shipping Container Architecture in Hot and Humid Climates.” International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology 7, no. 4 (August 31, 2017): 1114-1126. doi:10.18517/ijaseit.7.4.2235.
Jamaludin, Adi Ainurzaman, Zul Ilham, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Sarina Abdul Halim-Lim, and Hazreena Hussein. “Comfortable Liveable Space: Shipping Container and Bamboo as Sustainable Building Materials in Equatorial Climate Perspective?” International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability 8, no. 2 (May 11, 2021): 11–22. doi:10.11113/ijbes.v8.n2.728.
Shen, Jingchun, Benedetta Copertaro, Xingxing Zhang, Johannes Koke, Peter Kaufmann, and Stefan Krause. “Exploring the Potential of Climate-Adaptive Container Building Design Under Future Climates Scenarios in Three Different Climate Zones.” Sustainability 12, no. 1 (December 22, 2019): 108. doi:10.3390/su12010108.
Ling, P C H, C S Tan, Y H Lee, and S Mohammad. “Technical Information on ISO Shipping Container.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 884 (July 21, 2020): 012042. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/884/1/012042.
Brodaski, M. “Shipping Container Emergency Shelters. Unpublished Major Qualifying Project Report”. Department of Engineering. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, US. (2010).
Steinecker Containerhandel. “Technical Specification for Steel Dry Cargo Container 20’x8’x9’6” High Cube.” (2012). Available online: http://www.steinecker-container.de/container/Container2/Spez-Container/Spez_high%20cube20.pdf (accessed on 15 March 2020).
Steinecker Containerhandel. “Technical Specification for Steel Dry Cargo Container 40’x8’x9’6” High Cube.” (2012). Available online: http://steinecker-container.de/container/Container2/Spez-Container/Spez_high%20cube40.pdf (accessed on 15 March 2020).
Residential Shipping Container Primer. “Shipping container structural components and terminology.” (2013). Available online: http://residentialshippingcontainerprimer.com/CONTAINER%20COMPONENTS%20AND%20TERMINOLOGY. (accessed on 15 March 2020).
Foz, Vicente .B. “The National Building Code of the Philippines and its Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations”. Quezon City: Philippine Law Gazette (2015).
Santos, Lean Alfred (2014). “Substandard, too small-temporary housing for typhoon survivors.” Available online: https://www.devex.com/news/substandard-too-small-temporary-housing-for-typhoon-survivors-82622 (accessed on 24 May 2021).
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines. “National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) 2015. Volume I Buildings, Towers, and Other Vertical Structures. 7th Ed. (2016).
Thayer, Ken. (2017). “Most Common Building Thermal Insulation Materials on the Market Today.” Available online: https://insights.globalspec.com/article/6606/most-common-building-thermal-insulation-materials-on-the-market-today (accessed on 23 March 2021).
Climate.Onebuilding.Org. Available online: http://climate.onebuilding.org/default.html (accessed 18 March 2021).
Data.gov.ph. “Tacloban City, Leyte Climatological Normal Values.” Available online: https://data.gov.ph/dataset/ climatological-normal-values/resource/85921384-d5d1-4f6a-92ca-8b3f49693c22#{} (accessed on 27 April 2021).
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers “Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy” (Standard No. 55). Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (2010).
Hoyt, T., Schiavon, S., Tartarini, F., Cheung, T., Steinfeld, K., Picciolo, A., and Moon, D. “CBE thermal comfort tool. Center for the Built Environment.” University of California Berkeley (2019). Available online: http://comfort.cbe.berkeley.edu/ (accessed on 18 March 2021).
Ford, Brian, Schiano-Phan, Rosa, Vallejo, Juan A. “The Architecture of Natural Cooling, 2nd ed. London: Routledge (2019).
Fisette, Paul. (2003). “Windows: understanding energy efficient performance.” Available online: https://bct.eco.umass.edu/publications/articles/windows-understanding-energy-efficient-performance/ (accessed on 24 March 2019).
Energy.gov. “Window Types and Technologies.” Available online: https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/window-types-and-technologies (accessed on 25 March 2020).
DOI: 10.28991/cej-2021-03091735
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Richelle Gallardo Zafra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
