Evolution and Implications of Changes in Seismic Load Codes for Earthquake Resistant Structures Design

Abdul Kadir; Ahmad Syarif Sukri; Nini Hasriani Aswad; . Masdiana; . Nasrul

doi:10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-01-04

Authors

Abdul Kadir Department of Civil Engineering, Halu Oleo University, Kendari 93232,, Indonesia
Ahmad Syarif Sukri
ahmad.syarif.sukri@uho.ac.id
Department of Civil Engineering, Halu Oleo University, Kendari 93232,, Indonesia
Nini Hasriani Aswad Department of Civil Engineering, Halu Oleo University, Kendari 93232,, Indonesia
. Masdiana Department of Civil Engineering, Halu Oleo University, Kendari 93232,, Indonesia
. Nasrul Department of Civil Engineering, Halu Oleo University, Kendari 93232,, Indonesia

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): January

Research Articles

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

Seismic load is a critical load that can trigger damage or collapse of structures, especially in earthquake-prone areas. The susceptibility of structures to seismic loads is influenced by factors related to soil characteristics and structural behavior. This paper comprehensively examines the development of Indonesian seismic code design parameters and their comparison with the current seismic code. The results of the analysis showed that the design spectral acceleration of short-period AD and long-period A1 SKBI 1987 and SNI 2002 increased with increasing PGA values, with a consistent pattern of SC < SD < SE. Unlike the previous two codes, design spectral acceleration AD and A1 SNI 2012 and SNI 2019 experience fluctuations in all types of soil. The ratio design spectral acceleration of AD and A1 SNI 2019 to KBI 1987 and SNI 2002 varies; there are up, fixed, and down for SC, SD, and SE soil conditions. The ratio of design spectral acceleration AD and A1 SNI 2019 to SNI 2012 designs also varies; this condition is due to changes in site coefficients. There were significant changes to the SKBI 1987 and SNI 2002 structural systems, especially the low and medium seismic levels. The increase in the seismic influence coefficient ratio of some cities varies for each type of soil and code. The increase in the 1970 PMI seismic coefficient was < 30% for all soil types, and the highest percentage increase occurred in SC soil types. The increase in seismic coefficient in SKBI 1987, SNI 2002, and SNI 2012 is more dominant in SE soil types.

Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-01-04

Full Text: PDF

Kadir, A., Sukri, A. S., Aswad, N. H., Masdiana, ., & Nasrul, . (2024). Evolution and Implications of Changes in Seismic Load Codes for Earthquake Resistant Structures Design. Civil Engineering Journal, 10(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-01-04

Download Citation

[1] Boen, T., Wangsadinata, W. (1971). A Brief Outline of Seismicity and Earthquake engineering Problems in Indonesia. LPMB, Jakarta, Indonesia.
[2] N.I-18:1970. (1969). Indonesian Loading Code. Foundation for the Research Institute for Building Problems, Indonesian Standard Code, Bandung, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).
[3] Otani, S. (2004). Earthquake Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2(1), 3–24. doi:10.3151/jact.2.3.
[4] Dhakal, R. P. (2011). Structural design for earthquake resistance: Past, present and future. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission, 22 February, 2011, Christchurch, New Zealand.
[5] Leimena, S. L. (1979). Disaster in Bali Caused by Earthquake 1976 (A Report). Disasters, 3(1), 85–87. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.1979.tb00203.x
[6] Indonesian Standard Code. (1981). Indonesian Earthquake Resistant Design Regulations for Buildings. Building Problem Research Institute, Jakarta, Indonesia.
[7] SNI 03–1726-2002. (2002). Earthquake Resistance Design Procedures for House and Building. National Standardization Agency of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).
[8] SNI 1726–2012. (2012). Earthquake Resistance Design Procedures for Building and Non-Building Structures. National Standardization Agency of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).
[9] SNI 1726–2019. (2019). Earthquake Resistance Design Procedures for Building and Non-Building Structures. National Standardization Agency of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).
[10] Afriadi, Y, & Satyarno, I. (2013). Comparison of Design Spectra of several Big Cities in Indonesia in the 2012 Earthquake SNI and 2002 Earthquake SNI. National Conference on Civil Engineering 7 (KoNTekS 7), 24-26 October, 2013, Surakarta, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).
[11] Sengara, I. W., & Aldiamar, F. (2021). Assessment on earthquake resistance spectral design load criteria for buildings and infrastructures in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 331, 07009. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202133107009.
[12] Nugroho, W. O., Sagara, A., & Imran, I. (2022). The evolution of Indonesian seismic and concrete building codes: From the past to the present. Structures, 41, 1092–1108. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.032.
[13] Faizah, R., & Saputra, E. (2018). Seismic Demand Due to the Earthquake Hazard Map 2017 Determination in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 7th Engineering International Conference on Education, Concept and Application on Green Technology. doi:10.5220/0009007101080116.
[14] Faizah, R., & Amaliah, R. (2021). Comparative Study of Indonesian Spectra Response Parameters for Buildings According To 2012 and 2019 Seismic Codes. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 13(3). doi:10.30880/ijie.2021.13.03.020.
[15] Nugroho, N. S., Erizal, & Putra, H. (2021). Structure evaluation of building based on the earthquake response acceleration spectrum of the SNI 03-1726-2019. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 871(1), 012013. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/871/1/012013.
[16] Sutjipto, S., & Sumeru, I. (2021). Anomaly Phenomena on the New Indonesian Seismic Code SNI 1726:2019 Design Response Spectra. ICCOEE2020&2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 132, Springer, Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-33-6311-3_43.
[17] Partono, W., Irsyam, M., Nazir, R., Asrurifak, M., & Sari, U. C. (2022). Site Coefficient and Design Spectral Acceleration Evaluation of New Indonesian 2019 Website Response Spectra. International Journal of Technology, 13(1), 115. doi:10.14716/ijtech.v13i1.4132.
[18] Tampubolon, S., Simanjuntak, P., Tarapandjang, G. P., & I Putu Ellsa Sarassantika. (2023). The Performance Analysis of High-Rise Building Structure Based on SNI 03-1726-2012 & SNI 03-1726-2019 (Case Study: Tower 1 Transit-Oriented Development Apartment Pondok Cina, Depok). Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Engineering (JIPE), 2(1), 36–41. doi:10.22225/jipe.2.1.2023.36-41.
[19] SKBI 2.3.53.1987/UDC 693.55.693.25. (1987). Design Instructions for Reinforced Concrete and Reinforced Wall Structures for House and Building. Public Works Publishing Agency Foundation, Jakarta, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).
[20] Indonesian Standard Code. (1983). Indonesian Earthquake Resistant Design Provisions Code for Building. Foundation for the Research Institute for Building Problems, Jakarta, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).
[21] Fraser, I. A. N. (1983). A new draft code for seismic design of buildings in Indonesia. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 16(3), 247–254. doi:10.5459/bnzsee.16.3.247-254.
[22] SNI 03–1726-1989. (1989). Earthquake Resistance Design Guideline for House and Building. National Standardization Agency of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).
[23] UBC-97. (1997). Uniform Building Code Volume 2 Structural Engineering Design Provision. International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, United States.
[24] Irsyam, M., Hendriyawan, Asrurifak, M., Ridwan, M., Aldiamar, F., Sengara, I. W., ... & Firmanti, A. (2013). Past earthquakes in Indonesia and new seismic hazard maps for earthquake design of buildings and infrastructures. Geotechnical Predictions and Practice in Dealing with Geohazards, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5675-5_3.
[25] Sengara, I. W., Irsyam, M., Sidi, I. D., Mulia, A., Asrurifak, M., & Hutabarat, D. (2015). Development of earthquake risk-targeted ground motions for Indonesian Earthquake Resistance Building Code SNI 1726-2012. International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability, 12-15, 2015, Vancouver, Canada.
[26] ASCE 7–10. (2010). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston, United States. doi:10.1061/9780784412916.
[27] Luco, N., Ellingwood, B. R., Hamburger, R. O., Hooper, J. D., Kimball, J. K., & Kircher, C. A. (2007). Risk-targeted versus current seismic design maps for the conterminous United States. SEAOC 2007 Convention Proceedings, 26-29 September, 2007, Squaw Creek, United States.
[28] FEMA P-749. (2010). Earthquake-Resistant Design Concepts, an Introduction to the NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures. National Institute of Building Sciences Building Seismic Safety Council Washington, United States.
[29] Power, M., Chiou, B., Abrahamson, N., Bozorgnia, Y., Shantz, T., & Roblee, C. (2008). An Overview of the NGA Project. Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 3–21. doi:10.1193/1.2894833.
[30] Sengara, I. W., & Aldiamar, F. (2021). Assessment on earthquake resistance spectral design load criteria for buildings and infrastructures in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 331, 07009. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202133107009.
[31] Nugroho, W. O., Sagara, A., & Imran, I. (2022). The evolution of Indonesian seismic and concrete building codes: From the past to the present. Structures, 41, 1092–1108. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.032.
[32] ASCE 7–16. (2017). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston, United States. doi:10.1061/9780784414248.
[33] Boore, D. M., Stewart, J. P., Seyhan, E., & Atkinson, G. M. (2014). NGA-West2 Equations for Predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped PSA for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), 1057–1085. doi:10.1193/070113eqs184m.
[34] Campbell, K. W., & Bozorgnia, Y. (2014). NGA-West2 Ground Motion Model for the Average Horizontal Components of PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped Linear Acceleration Response Spectra. Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), 1087–1115. doi:10.1193/062913eqs175m.
[35] Chiou, B. S.-J., & Youngs, R. R. (2014). Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra. Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), 1117–1153. doi:10.1193/072813eqs219m.
[36] Stewart, J. P., & Seyhan, E. (2013). Semi-empirical nonlinear site amplification and its application in NEHRP site factors. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, United States.
[37] FEMA P-749. (2022). Earthquake-Resistant Design Concepts an Introduction to Seismic Provisions for New Buildings. Second Edition 2022. National Institute of Building Sciences Building Seismic Safety Council Washington, United States.
[38] FEMA 450. (2004). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures. Part 1. National Institute of Building Sciences Building Seismic Safety Council Washington, United States.
[39] ACI 318-19. (2019). Standard Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete-Commentary on Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. American Concrete Institute (ACI), Farmington Hills, United States.
[40] Uang, C. M. (1991). Establishing R (or R w) and C d factors for building seismic provisions. Journal of structural Engineering, 117(1), 19-28. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:1(19).
[41] Mwafy, A. M., & Elnashai, A. S. (2002). Calibration of Force Reduction Factors of RC Buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 6(2), 239–273. doi:10.1080/13632460209350416.
[42] Uang, C. (1991). Comparison of seismic force reduction factors used in U.S.A. and Japan. Earthquake Engineering, Structural Dynamics, 20(4), 389–397. Portico. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290200407.
[43] Paulay, T., & Priestley, M. N. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, United States. doi:10.1002/9780470172841.
[44] Miranda, E., & Bertero, V. V. (1994). Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design. Earthquake Spectra, 10(2), 357–379. doi:10.1193/1.1585778.
[45] Whittaker, A., Hart, G., & Rojahn, C. (1999). Seismic Response Modification Factors. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(4), 438–444. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1999)125:4(438).
[46] Elnashai, A. S., & Mwafy, A. M. (2002). Overstrength and force reduction factors of multistorey reinforced"concrete buildings. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 11(5), 329–351. doi:10.1002/tal.204.
[47] Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). (2009). Seismic Design Recommendations Compilation Seismology Committee Structural Engineers Association of California. Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC), Sacramento, United States.
[48] Elnashai, A. S., & Di Sarno, L. (2015). Fundamentals of earthquake engineering: from source to fragility. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, United States.
[49] Malhotra, P. K. (2005). Return Period of Design Ground Motions. Seismological Research Letters, 76(6), 693–699. doi:10.1785/gssrl.76.6.693.
[50] Goel, R. K., & Chopra, A. K. (1997). Vibration properties of buildings determined from recorded earthquake motions. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, University of California, Berkeley, United States.
[51] FEMA 302. (1997). NEHRP Recommend Provision for Seismic Regulation for New Building. National Institute of Building Sciences Building Seismic Safety Council Washington, United States.
[52] Xiaoguang, C., Jingshan, B., Youwei, S., Jianyi, Z., & Yudong, Z. (2012). Comparison of seismic fortification criterion of eight Asian countries. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 24-28 September, 2012, Lisbon, Portugal.
[53] NZS 1170.5:2004. (2004). Structural Design Actions and Commentary, Part 5, Earthquake Actions. Standard New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
[54] EN 1998-1. (2004). Design for Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
[55] Seed, H. B., Ugas, C., & Lysmer, J. (1976). Site-dependent spectra for earthquake-resistant design. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 66(1), 221–243. doi:10.1785/bssa0660010221.
[56] Mohraz, B., & Sadek, F. (2001). Earthquake Ground Motion and Response Spectra. The Seismic Design Handbook. Springer, Boston, United States. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1693-4_2.
[57] Pitilakis, K., Riga, E., & Anastasiadis, A. (2012). Design spectra and amplification factors for Eurocode 8. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 10(5), 1377–1400. doi:10.1007/s10518-012-9367-6.
[58] Pitilakis, K., Riga, E., & Anastasiadis, A. (2013). New code site classification, amplification factors and normalized response spectra based on a worldwide ground-motion database. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11(4), 925–966. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9429-4.
[59] Kim, D.-K., Park, H.-G., & Sun, C.-G. (2019). Design Earthquake Response Spectrum Affected by Shallow Soil Deposit. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 1–18. doi:10.1155/2019/4079217.
[60] Cubrinovski, M., & McCahon, I. (2011). Foundations on deep alluvial soils. Technical Report Prepared for the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
[61] Dhakal, R. P., Lin, S.-L., Loye, A. K., & Evans, S. J. (2013). Seismic design spectra for different soil classes. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 46(2), 79–87. doi:10.5459/bnzsee.46.2.79-87.
[62] Leyendecker, E. V., Hunt, R. J., Frankel, A. D., & Rukstales, K. S. (2000). Development of Maximum Considered Earthquake Ground Motion Maps. Earthquake Spectra, 16(1), 21–40. doi:10.1193/1.1586081.
[63] Luo Kaihai, W. Y. (2006). Research on conversion relationships among the parameters of ground motions seismic design codes of China, America and Europe. Building Structure, 36(8), 103-107.
[64] Carvalho E, C. (2011). Overview of Eurocode 8 (Background and Applications). Eurocode, Brussels, Belgium. Available online https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2022-06/S1_EC8-Lisbon_E%20CARVALHO.pdf (accessed on December 2023).
[65] Beer, M., Kougioumtzoglou, I. A., Patelli, E., & Au, S. K. (Eds.). (2015). Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35344-4.

Publication Start Year:	2015
JCR 2023 Impact Factor (IF):	4.3
JIF QUARTILE:	Q1
SJR 2023 Quartile:	Q1
Acceptance Rate:	27%
Review Speed (Average):	76 days
Issue Per Year:	12
Number of Volumes:	10
Number of Issues:	107
Number of Articles:	1552
Number of Reviewers:	3417
Number of Contributors:	3604
Contributing Countries:	86
No. of WoS Citations:	7986
WoS h-index:	34
Scopus CiteScore:	7.0
No. of Google Citations:	17324
Google h-index:	47
Google i10-index:	393
Abstract Views:	5,819,908
PDF Download:	3,790,637

Evolution and Implications of Changes in Seismic Load Codes for Earthquake Resistant Structures Design

Authors

Downloads

Login

Publisher and Affiliated Societies

Publisher & Affiliated Societies

Indexing & Abstracting

SidebarMenu

Journal Imprint

Journal Imprint

Journal Metrics

IndexedBy

Indexed In

Follow us

Follow Us

Most Cited Articles

Heavy Metal Removal Investigation in Conventional Activated Sludge Systems

Modeling of the Solar Thermal Energy Use in Urban Areas

Adsorption Behavior of Heavy Metal Ions by Hybrid Inulin-TEOS for Water Treatment

Modeling Finned Thermal Collector Construction Nanofluid-based Al2O3 to Enhance Photovoltaic Performance

visitors

Analytics

Information

Address

Contact Info: