Examining Social Acceptability of Solar Innovations in Smart Cities

Muhammad M. Khurshid; Hafiz M. Faisal Shehzad; Ammar Rashid; Umar Adeel

doi:10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-02-016

Authors

Muhammad M. Khurshid
mahboobkhurshid77@gmail.com
Department of Examinations, Virtual University of Pakistan, Islamabad,, Pakistan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0323-1088
Hafiz M. Faisal Shehzad Department of Computer Science and IT, University of Sargodha, Sargodha,, Pakistan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6364-997X
Ammar Rashid College of Engineering and IT, Ajman University, Ajman,, United Arab Emirates https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8642-6218
Umar Adeel Department of Computer Science and Engineering, American University of Ras al Khaimah, Ras Al-Khaimah,, United Arab Emirates https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1779-4877

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): February

Research Articles

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

Objective: The global challenge of climate change and the need for energy conservation have prompted a reevaluation of energy sources and policies worldwide. This study aims to investigate the societal acceptability of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems among citizens of smart cities, an aspect crucial yet underexplored in the context of renewable energy technologies. Methods/Analysis: A comprehensive survey was conducted involving 560 respondents to assess public perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors toward solar PV systems. The study also examined the moderating effects of area (urban/rural), gender, trust, and duration of use (experience) on societal acceptability. Findings: The results show that both independent and moderating variables significantly influence the social acceptability of solar innovations in smart cities. Key factors identified include the user-friendly design of solar systems, effective awareness campaigns highlighting their benefits, and compatibility with existing technologies. These elements are crucial in fostering positive attitudes and intentions towards the adoption of solar energy. Novelty/Improvement:This research provides valuable insights for policymakers, energy planners, and researchers, emphasizing the importance of considering demographic and experiential factors in policy-making. The findings suggest that societal acceptance of solar PV systems can be enhanced by targeting area-specific needs, leveraging trust, and promoting the benefits of prolonged usage experience.

Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-02-016

Full Text: PDF

[1] Nazir, L., & Sharifi, A. (2024). An analysis of barriers to the implementation of smart grid technology in Pakistan. Renewable Energy, 220. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2023.119661.
[2] Maqsoom, A., Hammad, M., Umer, M., Salman, A., & Ashraf, H. (2024). From intentions to actions: unveiling the socio-psychological drivers of solar home system adoption in developing nations. Architectural Engineering and Design Management. doi:10.1080/17452007.2024.2316658.
[3] Ferreira, L., Oliveira, T., & Neves, C. (2023). Consumer's intention to use and recommend smart home technologies: The role of environmental awareness. Energy, 263. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.125814.
[4] Schulte, E., Scheller, F., Sloot, D., & Bruckner, T. (2022). A meta-analysis of residential PV adoption: the important role of perceived benefits, intentions and antecedents in solar energy acceptance. Energy Research and Social Science, 84. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102339.
[5] Kapoor, K. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). Sustainable consumption from the consumer's perspective: Antecedents of solar innovation adoption. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 152. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104501.
[6] Hai, M. A. (2019). Rethinking the social acceptance of solar energy: Exploring "states of willingness” in Finland. Energy Research & Social Science, 51, 96–106. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.013.
[7] Billanes, J., & Enevoldsen, P. (2022). Influential factors to residential building Occupants' acceptance and adoption of smart energy technologies in Denmark. Energy and Buildings, 276, 112524. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112524.
[8] Cousse, J. (2021). Still in love with solar energy? Installation size, affect, and the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 145, 111107. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111107.
[9] Haque, A. N., Lemanski, C., & de Groot, J. (2021). Why do low-income urban dwellers reject energy technologies? Exploring the socio-cultural acceptance of solar adoption in Mumbai and Cape Town. Energy Research & Social Science, 74, 101954. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101954.
[10] Garg, B., & Barach, R. (2021). Collaborative governance for urban sustainability: implementing solar cities. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(4), 236–257. doi:10.1080/23276665.2021.1925132.
[11] Rodríguez-Segura, F. J., Osorio-Aravena, J. C., Frolova, M., Terrados-Cepeda, J., & Muñoz-Cerón, E. (2023). Social acceptance of renewable energy development in southern Spain: Exploring tendencies, locations, criteria and situations. Energy Policy, 173, 113356. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113356.
[12] Westerlund, M. (2020). Social acceptance of wind energy in urban landscapes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(9), 49–62. doi:10.22215/TIMREVIEW/1389.
[13] Lucchi, E., Adami, J., & Stawinoga, A. E. (2023). Social acceptance of photovoltaic systems in heritage buildings and landscapes: Exploring barriers, benefits, drivers, and challenges for technical stakeholders in northern Italy. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 60, 103544. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2023.103544.
[14] Mehmood, F., Umar, M., Dominguez, C., & Kazmi, H. (2022). The role of residential distributed energy resources in Pakistan's energy transition. Energy Policy, 167. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113054.
[15] Iten, R., Wagner, J., & Zeier Röschmann, A. (2024). On the Adoption of Smart Home Technology in Switzerland: Results from a Survey Study Focusing on Prevention and Active Healthy Aging Aspects. Smart Cities, 7(1), 370–413. doi:10.3390/smartcities7010015.
[16] Kumar, V., & Kaushik, A. K. (2022). Solar rooftop adoption among Indian households: a structural equation modeling analysis. Journal of Social Marketing, 12(4), 513–533. doi:10.1108/JSOCM-07-2021-0170.
[17] Qureshi, T. M., Ullah, K., & Arentsen, M. J. (2017). Factors responsible for solar PV adoption at household level: A case of Lahore, Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 754–763. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.020.
[18] Jan, I., Ullah, W., & Ashfaq, M. (2020). Social acceptability of solar photovoltaic system in Pakistan: Key determinants and policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123140.
[19] Kardooni, R., Yusoff, S. B., & Kari, F. B. (2016). Renewable energy technology acceptance in Peninsular Malaysia. Energy Policy, 88, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.005.
[20] Do, T. N., Burke, P. J., Baldwin, K. G. H., & Nguyen, C. T. (2020). Underlying drivers and barriers for solar photovoltaics diffusion: The case of Vietnam. Energy Policy, 144. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111561.
[21] Kiefer, C. P., & del Río, P. (2020). Analysing the barriers and drivers to concentrating solar power in the European Union. Policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119400.
[22] Alipour, M., Irannezhad, E., Stewart, R. A., & Sahin, O. (2022). Exploring residential solar PV and battery energy storage adoption motivations and barriers in a mature PV market. Renewable Energy, 190, 684–698. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.040.
[23] Asante, D., He, Z., Adjei, N. O., & Asante, B. (2020). Exploring the barriers to renewable energy adoption utilising MULTIMOORA- EDAS method. Energy Policy, 142. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111479.
[24] Alshammari, S. H., & Rosli, M. S. (2020). A review of technology acceptance models and theories. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, 4(2), 12-22.
[25] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. doi:10.2307/249008.
[26] Ahmad, S., Mat Tahar, R. bin, Cheng, J. K., & Yao, L. (2017). Public acceptance of residential solar photovoltaic technology in Malaysia. PSU Research Review, 1(3), 242–254. doi:10.1108/PRR-11-2016-0009.
[27] Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Muhwezi, M., Musimenta, D., Nuwasiima, S., & Najjemba, G. M. (2020). Exploring the link between vulnerability of energy systems and social acceptance of renewable energy in two selected districts of Uganda. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 14(6), 1089–1122. doi:10.1108/IJESM-08-2019-0007.
[28] Sommerfeld, J., Buys, L., & Vine, D. (2017). Residential consumers' experiences in the adoption and use of solar PV. Energy Policy, 105, 10–16. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.021.
[29] Sahu, G. P., Singh, P., & Dwivedi, P. (2021). Adoption of solar energy in India: a study through interpretive structural modelling. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 18(4), 457–473. doi:10.1108/WJSTSD-04-2021-0043.
[30] Sawyer, S. W. (1982). Leaders in change. Solar energy owners and the implications for future adoption rates. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 21(3), 201–211. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(82)90050-6.
[31] Lau, L. S., Senadjki, A., Ching, S. L., Choong, C. K., Seow, A. N., Choong, Y. O., & Wei, C. Y. (2021). Solar photovoltaic as a means to sustainable energy consumption in Malaysia: the role of knowledge and price value. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy, 16(4), 303–323. doi:10.1080/15567249.2021.1922545.
[32] Bouaguel, W., & Alsulimani, T. (2022). Understanding the Factors Influencing Consumers' Intention toward Shifting to Solar Energy Technology for Residential Use in Saudi Arabia Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18), 18. doi:10.3390/su141811356.
[33] Ahmed, Y. A., Rashid, A., & Khurshid, M. M. (2022). Investigating the Determinants of the Adoption of Solar Photovoltaic Systems”Citizen's Perspectives of Two Developing Countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18), 18. doi:10.3390/su141811764.
[34] Aravindan, K. L., Thurasamy, R., Raman, M., Ilhavenil, N., Annamalah, S., & Rathidevi, A. S. (2022). Modeling Awareness as the Crux in Solar Energy Adoption Intention through Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Mathematics, 10(12), 12. doi:10.3390/math10122045.
[35] Alam, S. S., Nik Hashim, N. H., Rashid, M., Omar, N. A., Ahsan, N., & Ismail, M. D. (2014). Small-scale households renewable energy usage intention: Theoretical development and empirical settings. Renewable Energy, 68, 255–263. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.010.
[36] Khalid, B., Urbański, M., Kowalska-Sudyka, M., WysŠ‚ocka, E., & Piontek, B. (2021). Evaluating consumers' adoption of renewable energy. Energies, 14(21), 21. doi:10.3390/en14217138.
[37] Alam, S. S., Ahmad, M., Othman, A. S., Shaari, Z. B. H., & Masukujjaman, M. (2021). Factors affecting photovoltaic solar technology usage intention among households in Malaysia: Model integration and empirical validation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–20. doi:10.3390/su13041773.
[38] Cowan, K. R., & Daim, T. U. (2011, July). Understanding adoption of energy efficiency technologies: applying behavioral theories of technology acceptance & use to understand the case of LED lighting for commercial, residential, and industrial end-users. 2011 Proceedings of PICMET'11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET), 31 July 2011 - 04 August 2011, Portland, United States.
[39] Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. (5th Ed.). Free Press, New York, United States.
[40] Rachmawati, I., Loy, N., & Karolus, M. L. (2023). Solar electricity: A dimming ray of hope in Ngada, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 1. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100574.
[41] Elmustapha, H., Hoppe, T., & Bressers, H. (2018). Consumer renewable energy technology adoption decision-making; comparing models on perceived attributes and attitudinal constructs in the case of solar water heaters in Lebanon. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 347–357. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.131.
[42] Wolske, K. S., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (2017). Explaining interest in adopting residential solar photovoltaic systems in the United States: Toward an integration of behavioral theories. Energy Research & Social Science, 25, 134–151. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.023.
[43] Kumar, P., Kumar, P., & Aggarwal, V. (2024). A behavioral study on villagers' adoption intention and carbon neutrality toward rooftop solar photovoltaic systems in India. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 18(1), 200–227. doi:10.1108/IJESM-11-2021-0009.
[44] Shakeel, S. R., Yousaf, H., Irfan, M., & Rajala, A. (2023). Solar PV adoption at household level: Insights based on a systematic literature review. Energy Strategy Reviews, 50. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2023.101178.
[45] Kumar, P., Gupta, S., & Dagar, V. (2024). Sustainable energy development through non-residential rooftop solar photovoltaic adoption: Empirical evidence from India. Sustainable Development, 32(1), 795–814. doi:10.1002/sd.2644.
[46] Müller, S., & Rode, J. (2013). The adoption of photovoltaic systems in Wiesbaden, Germany. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(5), 519–535. doi:10.1080/10438599.2013.804333.
[47] Labay, D. G., & Kinnear, T. C. (1981). Exploring the Consumer Decision Process in the Adoption of Solar Energy Systems. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), 271. doi:10.1086/208865.
[48] Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Boston, United States.
[49] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
[50] Rezaei, R., & Ghofranfarid, M. (2018). Rural households' renewable energy usage intention in Iran: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Renewable Energy, 122, 382–391. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.011.
[51] Sun, P. C., Wang, H. M., Huang, H. L., & Ho, C. W. (2020). Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward rooftop photovoltaic installation: The roles of personal trait, psychological benefit, and government incentives. Energy and Environment, 31(1), 21–39. doi:10.1177/0958305X17754278.
[52] Shakeel, S. R., & Rahman, S. U. (2018). Towards the establishment of renewable energy technologies' market: An assessment of public acceptance and use in Pakistan. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 10(4), 4. doi:10.1063/1.5033454.
[53] Rai, V., & Beck, A. L. (2015). Public perceptions and information gaps in solar energy in Texas. Environmental Research Letters, 10(7), 7. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/074011.
[54] Reyes-Mercado, P., & Rajagopal, R. (2017). Adoption of renewable energy technologies in Mexico: The role of cognitive factors and innovation attributes. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 11(4), 626–649. doi:10.1108/IJESM-02-2017-0001.
[55] Alipour, M., Stewart, R. A., & Sahin, O. (2021). Beyond the diffusion of residential solar photovoltaic systems at scale: Allegorising the battery energy storage adoption behaviour. Energies, 14(16), 5015. doi:10.3390/en14165015.
[56] Sekaran, U. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, United States.
[57] Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. doi:10.2307/30036540.
[58] Sposato, R. G., & Hampl, N. (2018). Worldviews as predictors of wind and solar energy support in Austria: Bridging social acceptance and risk perception research. Energy Research & Social Science, 42, 237–246. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.012.
[59] Chidembo, R., Francis, J., & Kativhu, S. (2024). Underlying beliefs that influence solar home system adoption in Vhembe district Municipality, South Africa. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100754.
[60] Kizilcec, V., Perros, T., Bisaga, I., & Parikh, P. (2022). Comparing adoption determinants of solar home systems, LPG and electric cooking for holistic energy services in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Research Communications, 4(7), 7. doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ac7f23.
[61] Aguinis, H., Hill, N. S., & Bailey, J. R. (2019). Best Practices in Data Collection and Preparation: Recommendations for Reviewers, Editors, and Authors. Organizational Research Methods, 24(4), 678–693. doi:10.1177/1094428119836485.
[62] Prajapati, B., Dunne, M., & Armstrong, R. (2010). Sample size estimation and statistical power analyses. Optometry today, 16(7), 10-18.
[63] Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
[64] Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., & Maragahh, H. (1995). Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Information & Management, 29(5), 227–238. doi:10.1016/0378-7206(95)00031-0.
[65] Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2017) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd Ed.). Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, United States.
[66] Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing statistical assumptions. NC Statistical Associates Publishing, Asheboro, United States.
[67] Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The Robustness of Test Statistics to Nonnormality and Specification Error in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16.
[68] Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd Ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York, United States.
[69] Liu, D., Qi, S., & Xu, T. (2023). Visual observation or oral communication? The effect of social learning on solar photovoltaic adoption intention in rural China. Energy Research & Social Science, 97. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.102950.
[70] Alwedyan, S. (2021). Factors Influencing the Adoption Intentions of Households toward Solar Photovoltaic Technology in Jordan: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. The Arab World Geographer, 24(4), 285-302. doi:10.5555/1480-6800.24.4.285.
[71] Aarakit, S. M., Ntayi, J. M., Wasswa, F., Adaramola, M. S., & Ssennono, V. F. (2021). Adoption of solar photovoltaic systems in households: Evidence from Uganda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 329. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129619.
[72] Abdullah, Zhou, D., Shah, T., Jebran, K., Ali, S., Ali, A., & Ali, A. (2017). Acceptance and willingness to pay for solar home system: Survey evidence from northern area of Pakistan. Energy Reports, 3, 54–60. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2017.03.002.
[73] Alsabbagh, M. (2019). Public perception toward residential solar panels in Bahrain. Energy Reports, 5, 253–261. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2019.02.002.

Publication Start Year:	2015
JCR 2023 Impact Factor (IF):	4.3
JIF QUARTILE:	Q1
SJR 2023 Quartile:	Q1
Acceptance Rate:	27%
Review Speed (Average):	76 days
Issue Per Year:	12
Number of Volumes:	10
Number of Issues:	107
Number of Articles:	1552
Number of Reviewers:	3417
Number of Contributors:	3604
Contributing Countries:	86
No. of WoS Citations:	7986
WoS h-index:	34
Scopus CiteScore:	7.0
No. of Google Citations:	17324
Google h-index:	47
Google i10-index:	393
Abstract Views:	5,819,908
PDF Download:	3,790,637

Examining Social Acceptability of Solar Innovations in Smart Cities

Authors

Downloads

Login

Publisher and Affiliated Societies

Publisher & Affiliated Societies

Indexing & Abstracting

SidebarMenu

Journal Imprint

Journal Imprint

Journal Metrics

IndexedBy

Indexed In

Follow us

Follow Us

Most Cited Articles

The ITB Unit Hydrograph Method: A Novel Approach to User-Defined Unit Hydrograph Development (Part II)

Sustainable Interlocking Blocks Containing Sugarcane Bagasse Ash: Structural Integrity, Cost Efficiency, and Environmental Benefits

Design a No-Fine Concrete Using Epoxy in Pavement

Energy Optimization in Residential Buildings: Evaluating PCM-CLT Wall Systems Across U.S. Climate Zones

Revolutionizing Recycled Aggregate Concrete: A Dual Approach Using HCl Treatment and Silica Fume

visitors

Analytics

Information

Address

Contact Info: