The ITB Unit Hydrograph Method: A Novel Approach to User-Defined Unit Hydrograph Development (Part II)
Downloads
Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-05-015
Full Text: PDF
[2] Natakusumah, D. K., Hatmoko, W., & Harlan, D. (2011). General Procedure for Calculating Synthetic Unit Hydrographs Using the ITB Method and Several Examples of Its Application. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 18(3), 251. doi:10.5614/jts.2011.18.3.6. (In Indonesian).
[3] Natakusumah, D. K., Harlan, D., & Hatmoko, W. (2013). A new synthetic unit hydrograph computation method based on the mass conservation principle. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 172, 27–38. doi:10.2495/RBM130031.
[4] Natakusumah, D. K. (2016). Use of ITB 1 and ITB-2 Synthetic Unit Hydrographs with Peak Discharge Factor (Kp) Calculated Exactly. Potensi: Jurnal Sipil Politeknik, 18(1), 35.
[5] Natakusumah, D. K., Wicaksana, G. A., & Nathaniel, B. (2021). Towards standardization of design flood calculation using Synthetic Unit Hydrograph methods. 7th International Seminar of HATHI, 30 October, Surabaya, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).
[6] Natakusumah, D. K., Hatmoko, W., Harlan, D., Nugroho, E. O., Kuntoro, A. A., Farid, M., Adinata, F., & Javas, J. (2025). The ITB Unit Hydrograph Method: A Novel Approach to User-Defined Unit Hydrograph Development (Part I). Civil Engineering Journal, 11(4), 1624–1651. doi:10.28991/cej-2025-011-04-021.
[7] Nash, J. E. (1957). The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph. Comptes Rendus et Rapports Assemblee Generale de Toronto, 3, 114-121.
[8] Ritter, A., & Muñoz-Carpena, R. (2013). Performance evaluation of hydrological models: Statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments. Journal of Hydrology, 480, 33-45. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004.
[9] Duc, L., & Sawada, Y. (2023). A signal-processing-based interpretation of the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(9), 1827-1839. doi:10.5194/hess-27-1827-2023, 2023.
[10] Teegavarapu, R. S., Sharma, P. J., & Patel, P. L. (2022). Frequency-based performance measure for hydrologic model evaluation. Journal of Hydrology, 608, 127583. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127583.
[11] Zhang, Y., Vaze, J., Chiew, F. H., Teng, J., & Li, M. (2014). Predicting hydrological signatures in ungauged catchments using spatial interpolation, index model, and rainfall–runoff modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 517, 936-948. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.032.
[12] Tunas, I. G. (2017). Development of Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Model Based on Fractal Characteristics of River Basin Areas. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).
[13] Tunas, I. G., & Lesmana, S. B. (2011). Deviation Analysis of Discharge Prediction Using Mock and NRECA Models. Infrastruktur, 1(1), 55-62.
- authors retain all copyrights - authors will not be forced to sign any copyright transfer agreements
- permission of re-useThis work (including HTML and PDF Files) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
