Hierarchical Learning-Based System Decomposition for Time-Dependent Structural System Reliability Assessment
Downloads
Time-dependent reliability assessment of structural systems is challenging when degradation and multiple interacting failure modes govern failure. Under these conditions, the system limit state function (LSF) may be highly nonlinear, non-smooth, and available only implicitly through high-fidelity analysis. This paper proposes a system decomposition and hierarchical learning (DHL) framework to construct an evaluable surrogate system LSF for degradation-driven, time-variant reliability analysis. The structural system is decomposed into dominant failure modes and their connectivity. Artificial neural networks are trained hierarchically to learn the decomposed relationships. Mode-level surrogates approximate the LSF of each failure mode. A system-level surrogate then integrates the mode-level performance quantities and time to capture mode interaction and mechanism switching. The resulting surrogate is combined with Monte Carlo simulation and the probability density evolution method to compute time-dependent failure probabilities and, when required, the evolution of the system performance probability density. Two benchmark problems—a highly nonlinear parallel system and a rigid–plastic portal frame with correlated collapse mechanisms under degrading capacities—are used to evaluate the approach. DHL improves system-level surrogate fidelity relative to direct system-level ANN learning, with mean reliability prediction errors below 3.1% and 1.23% in the two benchmarks, respectively, while remaining compatible with both sampling-based and density-evolution propagation schemes.
Downloads
[1] Zeng, Z., Barros, A., & Coit, D. (2023). Dependent failure behavior modeling for risk and reliability: A systematic and critical literature review. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 239, 109515. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2023.109515.
[2] Straub, D., Schneider, R., Bismut, E., & Kim, H. J. (2020). Reliability analysis of deteriorating structural systems. Structural Safety, 82, 101877. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.101877.
[3] Gong, J., Wang, X., & Mu, Y. (2024). Nonprobabilistic reliability analysis method for series-parallel structural systems with correlated uncertainties. Computers and Structures, 301, 107459. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2024.107459.
[4] Xiao, N. C., Yuan, K., & Zhou, C. (2020). Adaptive kriging-based efficient reliability method for structural systems with multiple failure modes and mixed variables. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 359, 112649. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.112649.
[5] Friederich, J., & Lazarova-Molnar, S. (2024). Reliability assessment of manufacturing systems: A comprehensive overview, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 72, 38–58. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.11.001.
[6] Song, J., Kang, W.-H., Lee, Y.-J., & Chun, J. (2021). Structural System Reliability: Overview of Theories and Applications to Optimization. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 7(2), 3121001. doi:10.1061/ajrua6.0001122.
[7] Lim, S., Kim, T., & Song, J. (2022). System-reliability-based disaster resilience analysis: Framework and applications to structural systems. Structural Safety, 96, 102202. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102202.
[8] Ditlevsen, O. (1979). Narrow Reliability Bounds for Structural Systems. Journal of Structural Mechanics, 7(4), 453–472. doi:10.1080/03601217908905329.
[9] Kumamoto, H., Tanaka, K., & Inoue, K. (1977). Efficient Evaluation of System Reliability by Monte Carlo Method. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-26(5), 311–315. doi:10.1109/TR.1977.5220181.
[10] Song, J., & Kang, W. H. (2009). System reliability and sensitivity under statistical dependence by matrix-based system reliability method. Structural Safety, 31(2), 148–156. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.012.
[11] Afshari, S. S., Zhao, C., Zhuang, X., & Liang, X. (2023). Deep learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: a review. Measurement Science and Technology, 34(7), 72001. doi:10.1088/1361-6501/acc602.
[12] Ying Wei Liu, & Moses, F. (1994). A sequential response surface method and its application in the reliability analysis of aircraft structural systems. Structural Safety, 16(1–2), 39–46. doi:10.1016/0167-4730(94)00023-J.
[13] Lu, N., Liu, Y., & Beer, M. (2018). System reliability evaluation of in-service cable-stayed bridges subjected to cable degradation. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 14(11), 1486–1498. doi:10.1080/15732479.2018.1459743.
[14] Coccon, M. N., Song, J., Ok, S. Y., & Galvanetto, U. (2017). A new approach to system reliability analysis of offshore structures using dominant failure modes identified by selective searching technique. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(6), 2360–2372. doi:10.1007/s12205-016-1192-z.
[15] Wu, H., Hu, Z., & Du, X. (2021). Time-dependent system reliability analysis with second-order reliability method. Journal of Mechanical Design, 143(3), 31101. doi:10.1115/1.4048732.
[16] Sgambi, L., Gkoumas, K., & Bontempi, F. (2012). Genetic Algorithms for the Dependability Assurance in the Design of a Long-Span Suspension Bridge. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27(9), 655–675. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00780.x.
[17] Wang, C., Beer, M., & Ayyub, B. M. (2021). Time-Dependent Reliability of Aging Structures: Overview of Assessment Methods. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 7(4), 3121003. doi:10.1061/ajrua6.0001176.
[18] Zhou, Q., Fan, W., Li, Z., & Ohsaki, M. (2017). Time-Variant System Reliability Assessment by Probability Density Evolution Method. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 143(11), 4017131. doi:10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001351.
[19] Guo, H., Zhang, J., Dong, Y., & Frangopol, D. M. (2026). LSTM-augmented probability-informed neural network-driven evolution estimation for time-dependent reliability analysis. Structural Safety, 118, 102652. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2025.102652.
[20] Guo, H., Zhang, J., Dong, Y., & Frangopol, D. M. (2024). Probability-informed neural network-driven point-evolution kernel density estimation for time-dependent reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 249, 110234. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2024.110234.
[21] Guo, H. Y., Dong, Y., & Gu, X. L. (2020). Two-step translation method for time-dependent reliability of structures subject to both continuous deterioration and sudden events. Engineering Structures, 225, 111291. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111291.
[22] Li, J., & Chen, J. B. (2004). Probability density evolution method for dynamic response analysis of structures with uncertain parameters. Computational Mechanics, 34(5), 400–409. doi:10.1007/s00466-004-0583-8.
[23] Li, J., & Gao, X. (2014). Probability density evolution method and its application in life-cycle civil engineering. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10(7), 921–927. doi:10.1080/15732479.2012.761250.
[24] Fan, W. L., Ang, A. H. S., & Li, Z. L. (2017). Reliability assessment of deteriorating structures using Bayesian updated probability density evolution method (PDEM). Structural Safety, 65, 60–73. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.12.004.
[25] Gomes, W. J. D. S. (2020). Shallow and deep artificial neural networks for structural reliability analysis. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 6(4), 41006. doi:10.1115/1.4047636.
[26] Thai, H.-T. (2022). Machine learning for structural engineering: A state-of-the-art review. Structures, 38, 448–491. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003.
[27] Xu, Z., & Saleh, J. H. (2021). Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 211, 107530. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2021.107530.
[28] Saraygord Afshari, S., Enayatollahi, F., Xu, X., & Liang, X. (2022). Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: A review. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 219, 108223. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2021.108223.
[29] Azarhoosh, Z., & Ilchi Ghazaan, M. (2025). A Review of Recent Advances in Surrogate Models for Uncertainty Quantification of High-Dimensional Engineering Applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 433, 117508. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117508.
[30] Li, J., Chen, J. Bing, & Fan, W. liang. (2007). The equivalent extreme-value event and evaluation of the structural system reliability. Structural Safety, 29(2), 112–131. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.03.002.
[31] Chen, J. B., & Li, J. (2009). A note on the principle of preservation of probability and probability density evolution equation. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 24(1), 51–59. doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2008.01.004.
[32] Zhao, Y.-G., & Ang, A. H.-S. (2003). System Reliability Assessment by Method of Moments. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(10), 1341–1349. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2003)129:10(1341).
[33] Lu, Z.-H., Hu, D.-Z., & Zhao, Y.-G. (2017). Second-Order Fourth-Moment Method for Structural Reliability. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 143(4), 6016010. doi:10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001199.
[34] Chatterjee, T., Adhikari, S., & Friswell, M. I. (2021). Multilevel Decomposition Framework for Reliability Assessment of Assembled Stochastic Linear Structural Systems. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 7(1), 4021003. doi:10.1061/ajrua6.0001119.
[35] Song, J., Wei, P., Valdebenito, M., & Beer, M. (2020). Adaptive reliability analysis for rare events evaluation with global imprecise line sampling. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 372, 113344. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.113344.
[36] Huang, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, B., Song, L., Wei, Y., & Zhang, W. (2025). Active learning Kriging approach for creep-fatigue reliability assessment of turbine disk. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 68(4), 1-22. doi:10.1007/s00158-025-03992-2.
[37] Thompson, T., McMullen, R., Nemani, V., Hu, Z., & Hu, C. (2025). A comparative study of acquisition functions for active learning kriging in reliability-based design optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 68(3), 1–40,. doi:10.1007/s00158-025-03978-0.
[38] Li, Y., Xiang, Y., Pan, B., Shi, L., Chen, Q., & Weng, W. (2025). Subspace enhanced active learning method for high-dimensional reliability analysis. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 68(3). doi:10.1007/s00158-025-03967-3.
[39] Zhang, Z., Pu, Q., & Hong, Y. (2026). Time-Variant Reliability Prediction Considering Multiple Failure Modes Based on R-Vine Copula. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(1), 23–38. doi:10.1007/s40999-025-01158-1.
[40] Wang, C., Zhang, H., & Beer, M. (2018). Computing tight bounds of structural reliability under imprecise probabilistic information. Computers and Structures, 208, 92–104. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.07.003.
[41] Golmoghani Ebrahimi, S., Noorzad, A., & Kupaei, H. J. (2024). Reliability Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Using Improved Hypercube Sampling (IHS) Method. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(2), 195–207. doi:10.1007/s40999-023-00863-z.
[42] Van Cao, V. (2022). Reliability-Based Moment Capacity Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Beams in Fire. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(11), 1291–1308. doi:10.1007/s40999-022-00746-9.
[43] Melchers, R. E., & Beck, A. T. (2017). Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, United States. doi:10.1002/9781119266105.
[44] Mori, Y., & Ellingwood, B. R. (1993). Reliability‐Based Service‐Life Assessment of Aging Concrete Structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 119(5), 1600–1621. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1993)119:5(1600).
[45] Shi, L., Pan, B., Chen, W., & Wang, Z. (2024). Deep Learning-Based Multifidelity Surrogate Modeling for High-Dimensional Reliability Prediction. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 10(3), 31106. doi:10.1115/1.4065846.
[46] Moustapha, M., Parisi, P., Marelli, S., & Sudret, B. (2024). Reliability analysis of arbitrary systems based on active learning and global sensitivity analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 248, 110150. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2024.110150.
[47] Yang, X., Zeqing, L., & Cheng, X. (2021). An enhanced active learning Kriging model for evidence theory-based reliability analysis. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 64(4), 2165–2181. doi:10.1007/s00158-021-02973-5.
[48] Moustapha, M., Marelli, S., & Sudret, B. (2022). Active learning for structural reliability: Survey, general framework and benchmark. Structural Safety, 96, 102174. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102174.
[49] Wang, D., Qiu, H., Gao, L., Xu, D., & Jiang, C. (2023). Time-dependent system reliability analysis using adaptive single-loop Kriging with probability of rejecting classification. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 66(8), 186. doi:10.1007/s00158-023-03638-1.
[50] Zhan, H., Liu, H., & Xiao, N. C. (2024). Time-dependent reliability analysis of structural systems based on parallel active learning Kriging model. Expert Systems with Applications, 247, 123252. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123252.
[51] Zhou, J., & Li, J. (2023). An efficient time-variant reliability analysis strategy embedding the NARX neural network of response characteristics prediction into probability density evolution method. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 200, 110516. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110516.
[52] Zhan, H., & Xiao, N. C. (2025). A new active learning surrogate model for time- and space-dependent system reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 253, 110536. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2024.110536.
[53] Xu, C., Yang, Y., Wu, H., & Zhou, J. (2023). A new active learning method for system reliability analysis with multiple failure modes. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 240, 109614. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2023.109614.
[54] Zhou, T., Guo, T., Dong, Y., & Peng, Y. (2024). Structural reliability analysis based on probability density evolution method and stepwise truncated variance reduction. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 75, 103580. doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103580.
[55] Wang, L., Li, Q., Zhang, X., Bu, X., Hu, P., & Han, Y. (2025). An efficient dynamic reliability method for maglev vehicle-bridge systems and its application in random controller parameters analysis. Journal of Low Frequency Noise Vibration and Active Control, 44(1), 477–496. doi:10.1177/14613484241279033.
[56] Samadian, D., Muhit, I. B., & Dawood, N. (2025). Application of Data-Driven Surrogate Models in Structural Engineering: A Literature Review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 32(2), 735–784. doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10152-0.
- Authors retain all copyrights. It is noticeable that authors will not be forced to sign any copyright transfer agreements.
- This work (including HTML and PDF Files) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
