Comparison of Compressive and Tensile Strengths of Dry-Cast Concrete with Ordinary Portland and Portland Pozzolana Cements
Concrete is the most widely used construction material in the world. Along with the increasing economic needs in the development of construction, precast technology has become a primary solution that leads to the industrialization. The use of precast concrete system offers several advantages, such as rapid erection, higher product quality, lower project cost, better sustainability, and improved occupational health and safety. In general, there are two casting methods used in concrete placement, namely wet- and dry-castings. The dry-cast concrete has also been used for its advantages particularly in precast concrete industries, e.g. its rapid hardening time for fast mold removal (it significantly increases the plant productivity). The use of Portland Pozzolana Cement (PPC) as a replacement to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) has become increasingly popular for the past decade. Hence, its application in dry-cast method needs to be further investigated for its mechanical properties such as its compressive and splitting tensile strengths. An experimental work was carried out to examine the properties of dry-cast concrete using both types of cements (PPC and OPC). The development of its compressive strength was also monitored at 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 56 days of age. The splitting test was conducted to describe the tensile strength of dry-cast concrete. The observation of crack and failure behaviour of all concrete specimens were also carried out.
Tavio; Kusuma, B.; and Suprobo, P., “Experimental Behavior of Concrete Columns Confined by Welded Wire Fabric as Transverse Reinforcement under Axial Compression,” ACI Structural Journal, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 109, No. 3, pp. 339–348, May–June 2012, doi.org/10.14359/51683747.
Pudjisuryadi, P.; Tavio; and Suprobo, P., “Performance of Square Reinforced Concrete Columns Externally Confined by Steel Angle Collars under Combined Axial and Lateral Load,” Procedia Engineering, Elsevier, Vol. 125, pp. 1043–1049, 2015, doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.160.
Tavio; Suprobo, P.; and Kusuma, B., “Ductility of Confined Reinforced Concrete Columns with Welded Reinforcement Grids,” Excellence in Concrete Construction through Innovation–Proceedings of the International Conference on Concrete Construction, pp. 339–344, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, London, UK, 2009, doi.org/10.1201/9780203883440.ch51.
Kusuma, B.; Tavio; and Suprobo, P., “Axial Load Behavior of Concrete Columns with Welded Wire Fabric as Transverse Reinforcement,” Procedia Engineering, Elsevier, Vol. 14, pp. 2039–2047, 2011, doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.256.
Tavio; Kusuma, B.; and Suprobo, P., “Investigation of Stress-Strain Models for Confinement of Concrete by Welded Wire Fabric,” Procedia Engineering, Elsevier, Vol. 14, pp. 2031–2038, 2011, doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.255.
Tavio; and Kusuma, B., “Stress-Strain Model for High-Strength Concrete Confined by Welded Wire Fabric,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 40–45, January 2009, doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2009)21:1(40).
Tavio; Anggraini, R.; Raka, I G. P.; and Agustiar, “Tensile Strength/Yield Strength (TS/YS) Ratios of High-Strength Steel (HSS) Reinforcing Bars,” AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, Vol. 1964, pp. 020036-1–020036-8, 2018, doi.org/10.1063/1.5038318.
Tavio; Suprobo, P.; and Kusuma, B., “Strength and Ductility Enhancement of Reinforced HSC Columns Confined with High-Strength Transverse Steel,” Proceedings of the Eleventh East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction (EASEC-11), pp. 350-351, Taipei, Taiwan, November 2008.
Anggraini, R.; Tavio; Raka, I G. P.; and Agustiar, “Stress-Strain Relationship of High-Strength Steel (HSS) Reinforcing Bars,” AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, Vol. 1964, pp. 020025-1–020025-8, 2018, doi.org/10.1063/1.5038307.
Ahmad, H. H.; and Tavio, “Experimental Study of Cold-Bonded Artificial Lightweight Aggregate Concrete,” AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, Vol. 1977, pp. 030011-1–030011-8, 2018, doi.org/10.1063/1.5042931.
Pudjisuryadi, P.; Tavio; and Suprobo, P., “Axial Compressive Behavior of Square Concrete Columns Externally Collared by Light Structural Steel Angle Sections,” International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Research India Publications, Vol. 11, No. 7, pp. 4655–4666, 2016.
Sabariman, B.; Soehardjono, A.; Wisnumurti; Wibowo, A.; and Tavio, “Stress-Strain Behavior of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Cylinders Spirally Confined with Steel Bars,” Advances in Civil Engineering, Hindawi, Vol. 2018, pp. 1–8, 2018, doi.org/10.1155/2018/6940532.
Astawa, M. D.; Raka, I G. P.; and Tavio, “Moment Contribution Capacity of Tendon Prestressed Partial on Concrete Beam-Column Joint Interior According to Provisions ACI 318-2008 Chapter 220.127.116.11(c) Due to Cyclic Lateral Loads,” MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, Vol. 58, No. 04005, pp. 1–8, 2016, doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20165804005.
Tavio; and Parmo, “A Proposed Clamp System for Mechanical Connection of Reinforcing Steel Bars,” International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Research India Publications, Vol. 11, No. 11, pp. 7355–7361, 2016.
Raka, I G. P.; Tavio; and Astawa, M. D., “State-of-the-Art Report on Partially-Prestressed Concrete Earthquake-Resistant Building Structures for Highly-Seismic Region,” Procedia Engineering, Elsevier, Vol. 95, pp. 43–53, 2014, doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.164.
Tavio; and Teng, S., “Effective Torsional Rigidity of Reinforced Concrete Members,” ACI Structural Journal, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 101, No. 2, pp. 252-260, March–April 2004, doi.org/10.14359/13023.
Tavio, “Interactive Mechanical Model for Shear Strength of Deep Beams,” Journal of Structural Engineering, American Society of Structural Engineers, Vol. 132, No. 5, pp. 826 –827, May 2006, doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2006)132:5(826).
Raharjo, D.; Subakti, A.; and Tavio, “Mixed Concrete Optimization Using Fly Ash, Silica Fume and Iron Slag on the SCC’s Compressive Strength,” Procedia Engineering, Elsevier, Vol. 54, pp. 827–839, 2013, doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.076.
Astawa, M. D.; Tavio; and Raka, I G. P., “Ductile Structure Framework of Earthquake Resistant of High-Rise Building on Exterior Beam-Column Joint with the Partial Prestressed Concrete Beam-Column Reinforced Concrete,” Procedia Engineering, Elsevier, Vol. 54, pp. 413–427, 2013, doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.037.
ASTM Subcommittee C09.24, “Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Fly Ash or Natural Pozzolans for Use in Portland-Cement Concrete (ASTM C311/C311M-17),” ASTM International, 2017, doi.org/10.1520/C0311_C0311M-17.
ASTM Subcommittee C09.24, “Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete (ASTM C618-17a),” ASTM International, 2017, doi.org/10.1520/C0618-17A.
ASTM Subcommittee C01.10, “Standard Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements (ASTM C595/C595M-18),” ASTM International, 2018, doi.org/10.1520/C0595_C0595M-18.
ACI Committee 211, “Guide for Selecting Proportions for No-Slump Concrete (ACI 211.3R-02),” American Concrete Institute, 2002, 26 pp.
ASTM Subcommittee C09.20, “Standard Test Method for Materials Finer than 75-μm (No. 200) Sieve in Mineral Aggregates by Washing (ASTM C117-17),” ASTM International, 2017, doi.org/10.1520/C0117-17.
ASTM Subcommittee C09.20, “Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates (ASTM C33/C33M-18),” ASTM International, 2018, doi.org/10.1520/C0033_C0033M-18.
ASTM Subcommittee C09.20, “Standard Test Method for Organic Impurities in Fine Aggregates for Concrete (ASTM C40/C40M-16),” ASTM International, 2016, doi.org/10.1520/C0040_C0040M-16.
ASTM Subcommittee C09.20, “Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates (ASTM C136/C136M-14),” ASTM International, 2014, doi.org/10.1520/C0136_C0136M-14.
ASTM Subcommittee C09.20, “Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate (ASTM C128-15),” ASTM International, 2015, doi.org/10.1520/C0128-15.
ASTM Subcommittee C09.20, “Standard Test Method for Bulk Density (“Unit Weight”) and Voids in Aggregate (ASTM C29/C29M-17a),” ASTM International, 2017, doi.org/10.1520/C0029_C0029M-17A.
ASTM Subcommittee C09.20, “Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate (ASTM C127-15),” ASTM International, 2015, doi.org/10.1520/C0127-15.
ASTM Subcommittee C09.20, “Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine (ASTM C131/C131M-14),” ASTM International, 2014, doi.org/10.1520/C0131_C0131M-14.
ASTM Subcommittee C09.61, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens (ASTM C39/C39M-18),” ASTM International, 2018, doi.org/10.1520/C0039_C0039M-18.
ASTM Subcommittee: C09.61, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens (ASTM C496/C496M-17),” ASTM International, 2017, doi.org/10.1520/C0496_C0496M-17.
Raphael, J. M., “Tensile Strength of Concrete,” ACI Journal, Proceedings, V. 81, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1984, pp. 158-165, doi.org/10.14359/10653 .
Gardner, N. J., “Effect of Temperature on the Early-Age Properties of Type I, Type III, and Type I/Fly Ash Concretes,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 87, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1990, pp. 68-78, doi.org/10.14359/2381.
Oluokun, F. A.; Burdette, E. G.; and Deatherage, J. H., “Splitting Tensile Strength and Compressive Strength Relationships at Early Ages,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 88, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1991, pp. 115-121, doi.org/10.14359/1859.
Arioglu, N.; Girgin, Z. C.; and Arioglu, E., “Evaluation of Ratio between Splitting Tensile Strength and Compressive Strength for Concretes up to 120 MPa and its Application in Strength Criterion,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 103, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2006, pp. 18-24, doi.org/10.14359/15123.
Mokhtarzadeh, A.; and French, C., “Mechanical Properties of High Strength Concrete with Consideration for Precast Applications,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 97, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2000, pp. 136-147, doi.org/10.14359/816.
ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318M-14) and Commentary (ACI 318RM-14),” American Concrete Institute, 2014, 519 pp.
ACI Committee 363, “Report on High-Strength Concrete (ACI 363R-10),” American Concrete Institute, 2010, 65 pp.
Comite European du Béton/Fédération Internationale de laPrecontrainte, “CEB-FIP Model Code for Concrete Structures 1990: Evaluation of the Time Dependent Behaviour of Concrete,” Bulletin d’Information No. 199, Lausanne, 1991, 201 pp., doi.org/10.1680/ceb-fipmc1990.35430.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Rasyiid Lathiif Amhudo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.