The Influence of Intertextuality on Aesthetic Principles in Postmodernist Painting and Architecture
Intertextuality reflects certain studies theories shaped in recent decades and has been widely used in artistic and literary studies as well as other studies in the field of Humanities. Intertextuality is not merely a theoretical notion in literary studies since its influence embraces the intellectual and cultural field as a whole. Intertextuality not only challenges many traditional beliefs, but also addresses the fact that a culture is constantly seeking to prove its own originality and identity through suppressing plurality, diversity, altruism, and dissent shall never tolerate the inevitable consequences of this concept. On the other hand, as a cultural and historical term, Postmodernism often invokes in one’s mind notions of hybridization, emulation, and combination of pre-established styles and trends. In the same way, contemporary art relies on certain visually distinguishable images of classical paintings. Apparently, Intertextuality serves to highlight the important notions of the fundamental relationship as well as the mutual bond and interdependence in today’s cultural existence. This article studies how Intertextuality as a way of thinking has influenced the development of various painting and architectural styles. For this purpose, we first define Intertextuality and investigate how and why it has come to encompass its present meanings and applications.
rahimi, Samira atani, panahi, Siamak,” Intertextual Reading of the Bernard Tschumi’s Works with an Emphasis on the Concept of In-between Space “, 2014-2015, Pazhuhesh-e Honar (Biannual) Vol.4.No.
Ghiyasvand, M. (2013). “Interpretation in the kristeva`s Intertextuality”, Wisdom and Philosophy Magazin, Vol.9, No.3. Page, 97-114. ISSN 1735-3238.
Tahmasebi, Z. (2009). “The collection of this cloud is left in the throat”, No. 63, Page 18-19.
Bakhtin, M. M. & Volosinov, V. N. (1986). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Trans. L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik. London: Harvard University Press.
Kristeva, J. (1980).” The Bounded Text. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art”. Roudiez, L. S. (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell, 36-63.
Allen, Graham, translated by: Yazdanjo, P. (2013). "intertextuality", Fourth Edition, Markaz publication.
Ahmadi, B. (2013), “semiotics of visual signs of the text to visual communication”, thirteenth edition, Markaz publication.
Kristeva, Julia. “Du Sujet En Linguistique ” Languages 6, no. 24 (1971): 107–126. doi:10.3406/lgge.1971.2609.
Barthes, Roland. “Roland Barthes.” Roland Barthes (1977): 1–186. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-03518-2_1.
McMahon, j. A. (1999) “ Towards a Unified Theory of Beauty,” Literature and Aesthetics:9: page 7-27 .
Plato (1997a) Phaedrus, in complete Work, ed. J . M. Cooper, Indianapolis: Hackett.
Aquinas (1964-76) Summa Theologiae, London and New York: Blackfriars .
Kant, I. (1987). Critique of Judgment,trans. W . S. Pular,Indianapolis: Hackett .
Gat, B,. Dominique, translators group: Sanei Darreh Bidi, M, Nojoumian, A,. Ahmad Zadeh, S,. Mohaghegh, B, Ghasemian, M, Sassanid, F., (2012). "Encyclopaedia of Aesthetics", sixth edition, Institute of authoring, translation and publishing works of art "text".
Gulyga, Arsenij. “Immanuel Kant” (1987). doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-0542-2.
Ahmadi, B. (2013), “constructing and interpreting texts”, sixteenth edition, Markaz publication.
Ahmadi, B. (2013), "Truth & Beauty of Lessons for philosophy of art", twenty-seventh edition, Markkas publication.
Baudrillard, Jean. “The Year 2000 Has Already Happened.” Body Invaders (1988): 35- 44. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-19095-9_3.
Jameson, Fredric R. “Soseki and Western Modernism.” Boundary 2 18, No. 3 (1991): 123. doi:10.2307/303206.
Hutcheon, Linda. “On the Art of Adaptation.” Daedalus 133, No. 2 (April 2004): 108–111. doi:10.1162/001152604323049460.
Richardson, John Adkins, and Charles Jencks. “Post-Modernism.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 23, No. 4 (1989): 114. doi:10.2307/3333041.
Parini, Jay, and George Steiner. “The Question of George Steiner.” The Hudson Review 38, No. 3 (1985): 496. doi:10.2307/3851389.
Bozorg Bigdeli, S, Ghobadi, H, Ghasem Zadeh, A. (2009). "intertextuality analysis, mythic narrative of death", Journal of Literary Research, Vol 6, No. 25.
Navar Mollag, B. (2007). "Reflections on Roland Barthes theory of intertextuality, Iran newspaper.
Navar Mollag, B. (2007). "Bakhtin’s Dialogism and intertextuality ", Journal of Human Sciences, No. 7.
Namvar Motlagh, B, Kangarani, M. (2007). “intertextuality analysis to analysis of discourse ", Academy of Arts Newsletter, No. 12.
Kangarani, M. “Intertextuality in Iranian art at the painting of the Safavid period”, Academy of Arts Newsletter.
Namvar Motlagh, B. “The discovery of intertextuality, how to spread and emergence of a theory and criticism”.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Leila Damirchi Loo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.