Macroscopic Traffic Flow Characterization at Bottlenecks

Macroscopic Traffic Model Traffic Flow Transition LWR Model Explicit Upwind Difference Scheme Stability Analysis.

Authors

  • Amir Iftikhar
    niuip.amir@gmail.com
    National Institute of Urban Infrastructure Engineering, Peshawar,, Pakistan
  • Zawar H. Khan a) National Institute of Urban Infrastructure Engineering, Peshawar, Pakistan. b) Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology Peshawar,, Pakistan
  • T. Aaron Gulliver Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria,, Canada
  • Khurram S. Khattak Department of Computer System Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology Peshawar,, Pakistan
  • Mushtaq A. Khan Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology Mardan,, Pakistan
  • Murtaza Ali Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology Mardan,, Pakistan
  • Nasru Minallahe Department of Computer System Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology Peshawar,, Pakistan
Vol. 6 No. 7 (2020): July
Research Articles

Downloads

Traffic congestion is a significant issue in urban areas. Realistic traffic flow models are crucial for understanding and mitigating congestion. Congestion occurs at bottlenecks where large changes in density occur. In this paper, a traffic flow model is proposed which characterizes traffic at the egress and ingress to bottlenecks. This model is based on driver response which includes driver reaction and traffic stimuli. Driver reaction is based on time headway and driver behavior which can be classified as sluggish, typical or aggressive. Traffic stimuli are affected by the transition width and changes in the equilibrium velocity distribution. The explicit upwind difference scheme is used to evaluate the Lighthill, Whitham, and Richards (LWR) and proposed models with a continuous injection of traffic into the system. A stability analysis of these models is given and both are evaluated over a road of length 10 km which has a bottleneck. The results obtained show that the behavior with the proposed model is more realistic than with the LWR model. This is because the LWR model cannot adequately characterize driver behavior during changes in traffic flow.